keeble and shukat in palo alto has a lot of used gear. last time I was there they had several used 4x5 film holders. not sure the price but would guess around $10 each
The Radionar came from a Franka Rolfix 6X9 folding MF camera. Wide open it appears to cover the 4X5 ground glass fairly well but I know it won't cover it stopped down.That Radionar is no slouch of a lens. I suspect it's from a medium format folder though with an image circle for maybe up to 6x9. I got one on a whim for $25 from a box of lenses and shutters in the back of a camera repairman's shop. I know it covers 6x6 as I used it mounted on my Rolleiflex SL66 with good success:
View attachment 111413
Acros in Rodinal
I use 6x6, 6x8 and 6x12 backs with my Wista and Graflex all the time. They allow use of lenses I could not use on many of my standard medium format cameras. It's not overkill, it's another use.
For now, I'm having fun and actually using The Beast.
The Radionar [...] Wide open it appears to cover the 4X5 ground glass fairly well but I know it won't cover it stopped down.
As the lens is stopped down, the coverage will increase. That said, you may well find the corners are vignetting or mushy even when stopped down - For some subjects, it may well be just the effect you're looking for
That Radionar is no slouch of a lens.
Interesting. Back when, Modern Photography had nothing good at all to say about Radionars on small format cameras.
LOL!Shhhh! My Radionar will hear you!
The Radionar came from a Franka Rolfix 6X9 folding MF camera. Wide open it appears to cover the 4X5 ground glass fairly well but I know it won't cover it stopped down.
...Y'r Radionar is a normal lens for 2x3 (6x9 in metric) so trying it out with a D610 isn't fully informative; no information at all about what the lens does towards 2x3's edges, and that's where its likely to do poorly.
Never mind, it will be better on 6x7 than on 6x9 and the important thing is that you have a lens you can use on y'r Toyo. I wouldn't count on it putting good image in 4x5's corners, but for the time being that doesn't matter at all.
Some lenses will illuminate the ground glass but will not actually cover. Everything will look good while you are shooting but when you get your negatives back the corners will be vignetted.
PCC, if I was in your shoes I get a smaller camera like a Century Graphic, or similar, some have better movements.
You can get one with a decent lens at quite low prices, and forget the Radionar.
Ian
I don't understand why people who usually know what they're doing -- that's you, Mr. Grant -- perpetuate the myth that Crown Graphics have usable movements. Front rise, yes, otherwise forget it.
I think you missed the point about this post. It's about using what I have available to me instead of waiting until I can purchase a better suited lens and camera and film and...PCC, if I was in your shoes I get a smaller camera like a Century Graphic, or similar, some have better movements.
You can get one with a decent lens at quite low prices, and forget the Radionar.
Ian
Thanks! That's the plan. Good to know about the Century Graphics.PCC, use your Calumet and Radionar and 6x7 roll holder and be happy.
PCC, so you'll know, I've had a Century Graphic for years and am happy with it. Its a fine camera, but not a view camera.
I think you missed the point about this post. It's about using what I have available to me instead of waiting until I can purchase a better suited lens and camera and film and...
Photography is about getting out there and making impressions on either film or a digital sensor. The equipment used to get these impressions are secondary to the photographer's eye and vision. If I can't use my camera now and I get an idea for a photograph, I may lose that between when I get the idea and when I can finally get the equipment to actually pull it off. Yes, I'm not using the correct equipment to take photos using the C2, but, I *am* taking photos with it and learning to use this beast. Eventually, I will be taking photos with this camera for it's intended use: still life images and portraits on 4X5 sheet film. The plan is to use the MO67 as a learning tool and to either buy or to make a lightweight field camera (leaning towards the latter) down the road when I have more experience using the larger formats. These are baby steps that I am taking right now. Who knows? I might just abandon LF altogether. I might step up to even larger formats. I won't know until I've had a chance to begin using what I have and to add to it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?