Martin Parr doesn't care for film

Trees

D
Trees

  • 0
  • 2
  • 52
Waiting For The Rain

A
Waiting For The Rain

  • 2
  • 0
  • 447
Sonatas XII-53 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-53 (Life)

  • 3
  • 3
  • 748
Let’s Ride!

A
Let’s Ride!

  • 3
  • 2
  • 889
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 7
  • 4
  • 1K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,778
Messages
2,796,525
Members
100,033
Latest member
apoman
Recent bookmarks
0

mynewcolour

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
306
Location
Gloucestershire, England
Format
35mm
The reason Parr was ground breaking is he took the colour work of people like Stephen Shore and William Eggleston - whose work was reviled by critics for eschewing the dominant monochrome aesthetic of "serious" photography - and gave it an ironic twist. All of those people stepped on the establishment's toes in different ways, and in doing so advanced photography as a medium. You can like Martin Parr's colour work or hate it, but to lack an understanding of its place in the history of photography is pure ignorance.

Absolutely.

And he is still in a niche. Nobody else is shooting culture as he does.
 

monkowa

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
51
Location
Missoula, Mo
Format
35mm
Reading this thread makes me enjoy the singular aspect of photography even more. I think Parr is quite correct about 'snobs' and here lies proof.

Kai is cool, enjoyable and I've learned a lot from him and his cohorts.

As an aside: love or hate it, Parr has done notable work and is highly regarded for a reason.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom