Here is a link to a good site that will give you a good overview of the Mamiya Universal and the Super 23.
A lot of people will tell you that it is a heavy camera but that will be determined by the individual user. i have both the Universal and the Super 23 and really do enjoy them. I normally shoot 6x9 on the 120 and have 4 backs so i can carry an assortment of films when I am out. There are an assortment of lenses from 50mm f6.3 that is an excellent lens, 65mm f6.3, 100 f3.5 and 100 f2.8 which is a great lens, sharp, 150mm and a 250mm f5. With the 250mm on the camera and a film back the camera is heavy. I haven't had any problems with either camera and I have had them for 1t least 15 years. The film backs are known for keeping the film flat. You can get film backs in 6x9, 6x7 and an early back that allowed to shoot 6.45, 6x7 and 6x9 but it needed masks to be installed . Some users have had issues with the rangefinders but there a ample articles on the internet that shows you how to do adjustments. The Super 23 has bellows where the Universal does not and the Universal needs adapter plates to mount the roll film backs. If the one you are looking at doesn't have a roll film back with it make sure the adapter plate M is on the camera.
https://emulsive.org/reviews/camera...3-and-mamiya-universal-press-by-kikie-wilkins
Gord
Thanks will keep you posted. Yes I’ve read “reviewers” on this camera, it’s can be subjective most of the time.I really feel that these unprecise and blogger tipe reviews are not worth reading...
Its more usefull to buy the camera and use the time for getting to know how it works and photograph...
If you dont like it i can buy it from you.
Thanks for the detailed information.Here is a link to a good site that will give you a good overview of the Mamiya Universal and the Super 23.
A lot of people will tell you that it is a heavy camera but that will be determined by the individual user. i have both the Universal and the Super 23 and really do enjoy them. I normally shoot 6x9 on the 120 and have 4 backs so i can carry an assortment of films when I am out. There are an assortment of lenses from 50mm f6.3 that is an excellent lens, 65mm f6.3, 100 f3.5 and 100 f2.8 which is a great lens, sharp, 150mm and a 250mm f5. With the 250mm on the camera and a film back the camera is heavy. I haven't had any problems with either camera and I have had them for 1t least 15 years. The film backs are known for keeping the film flat. You can get film backs in 6x9, 6x7 and an early back that allowed to shoot 6.45, 6x7 and 6x9 but it needed masks to be installed . Some users have had issues with the rangefinders but there a ample articles on the internet that shows you how to do adjustments. The Super 23 has bellows where the Universal does not and the Universal needs adapter plates to mount the roll film backs. If the one you are looking at doesn't have a roll film back with it make sure the adapter plate M is on the camera.
https://emulsive.org/reviews/camera...3-and-mamiya-universal-press-by-kikie-wilkins
Gord
Is there anything I be looking for? “Red flags” when buying a system as this ?If you dig enough sometimes you can old reviews in Modern or Popular Photography. I have 2 universals and a press, set of 4 lens. As noted above it is a heavy beast, gets heavier as I get older, as pro level camera it is very rugged. I have 6X9 and 6X7 backs, the view finder on the Universal bright line frames for both backs and a switch for the 100, 150 and 250 lens but you will need a separate finder for the wide angles. The lens are really good, I have the 100 3.5, there is 100 2.8 as well. I have the 50 and 65 wides and 150, the 250 tends to be pricy and as I understand it there are coupled and uncoupled versions. While in the U.S. Air Force in the early 70s we used Konica Rapids, what was nice about the Konica system is that advancing the film also cocks the shutter, with the Universal you need to cock the shutter which slows down shooting a bit. On the other hand if you count the lens that were matched for the Polaroid version of the Universal there are more lens available, larger options for formats, in addition to the 6X9 and 6x7 backs there is a multiback with masks for 6X4.5, 6X6 and 6X9 and sheet film back.
Here is a short review found in Modern, you need to go to the bottom archived by Mieeckman.com
https://www.mikeeckman.com/2020/04/kepplers-vault-60-top-47-cameras-1974/
Is there anything I be looking for? “Red flags” when buying a system as this ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?