Mamiya Universal - 100mm lens f2.8 lens - need some confirmation on rangefinder issue please!

Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 4
  • 0
  • 44
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 1
  • 2
  • 47
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 48
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 7
  • 5
  • 197

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,819
Messages
2,781,292
Members
99,714
Latest member
MCleveland
Recent bookmarks
0

ajmiller

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 1, 2007
Messages
642
Location
North Yorkshire, UK
Format
Multi Format
Just received the above camera and lens and everything is excellent apart from the rangefinder - I think!
I know the f3.5 lens needs to be pulled out from it's retracted position when used but is the f2.8 lens the same?
The rangefinder rings coincide ok at long distances but if I focus any nearer than 2 meters (8ft) the circles just seem to stop and do not coincide. Is this a rangefinder problem or associated with something I'm not doing correctly on the lens as asked above?
Thanks for any help.
Tony
 

Dennis-B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
484
Location
Southeast Michigan
Format
35mm
I don't think the 100 f/2.8 collapses. It's a 6-element Tessar-type, and the collapsible model only has 4 elements. It focuses down to @ 2 meters. Could be that the issue?

Have you downloaded the owner's manual? It may help, especially with focusing.
 
OP
OP
ajmiller

ajmiller

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 1, 2007
Messages
642
Location
North Yorkshire, UK
Format
Multi Format
I did download the manual but obviously missed that part! I'll have a re-read. thanks for the advice.

I don't think the 100 f/2.8 collapses. It's a 6-element Tessar-type, and the collapsible model only has 4 elements. It focuses down to @ 2 meters. Could be that the issue?

Have you downloaded the owner's manual? It may help, especially with focusing.
 
OP
OP
ajmiller

ajmiller

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 1, 2007
Messages
642
Location
North Yorkshire, UK
Format
Multi Format
Doing some research it appears the minimum focussing distance is 3.5ft (1.06m) on the 100mm f/2.8 lens.
 

Mamiya_Repair

Advertiser
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
222
Location
Nevada
Format
Medium Format
The 100mm f/2.8 should rangefinder couple down to its closest distance of 1 meter. I would check infinity with the lens to see if that works. If other lenses are working OK with the body, then the rangefinder cam on the lens has an issue.
 
OP
OP
ajmiller

ajmiller

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 1, 2007
Messages
642
Location
North Yorkshire, UK
Format
Multi Format
Thanks. Infinity works ok. I don’t have any other lenses.

The 100mm f/2.8 should rangefinder couple down to its closest distance of 1 meter. I would check infinity with the lens to see if that works. If other lenses are working OK with the body, then the rangefinder cam on the lens has an issue.
 

Mamiya_Repair

Advertiser
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
222
Location
Nevada
Format
Medium Format
Thanks. Infinity works ok. I don’t have any other lenses.
In that case, the lens rangefinder cam is OK. I would remove the lens, look into the lens mount and carefully push back the rangefinder coupling pin. I should move smoothly and come to rest on the back of the lens mount. My guess is that it is not fully coming to rest on the lens mount and something is sticking.
 

reddesert

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
2,405
Location
SAZ
Format
Hybrid
You can also observe the operation of the RF coupling pin by putting the lens on, removing the film back, and watching the coupling pin as you turn the focus ring of the lens. The pin should ride on a brass ring on the rear of the lens, which is the lens's RF cam. It seems like it is failing to follow the cam as you focus close (lens gets further from body).
 
OP
OP
ajmiller

ajmiller

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 1, 2007
Messages
642
Location
North Yorkshire, UK
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for your help. I've done what you suggest and I've attached a few photos. The rangefinder coupling pin seems to move back and forward ok - not exactly smoothly but returns ok. On the lens what is, I presume, the RF cam definitely doesn't follow focus. It does stop before I get to the minimum focus distance. So, it appears the RF cam is not set up for this lens? Maybe? Unless you can see soemthing else amiss. The other thing that strikes me is the lens doesn't look straight on - see second photo. Not sure if that's a problem? Thanks again.
IMG_2792.JPEG IMG_2794.JPEG IMG_2795.JPEG
 

Mamiya_Repair

Advertiser
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
222
Location
Nevada
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for your help. I've done what you suggest and I've attached a few photos. The rangefinder coupling pin seems to move back and forward ok - not exactly smoothly but returns ok. On the lens what is, I presume, the RF cam definitely doesn't follow focus. It does stop before I get to the minimum focus distance. So, it appears the RF cam is not set up for this lens? Maybe? Unless you can see soemthing else amiss. The other thing that strikes me is the lens doesn't look straight on - see second photo. Not sure if that's a problem? Thanks again.
View attachment 287281 View attachment 287282 View attachment 287283 [/QUFrOTE]
The problem is that the light baffle on the rear of the lens
Thanks for your help. I've done what you suggest and I've attached a few photos. The rangefinder coupling pin seems to move back and forward ok - not exactly smoothly but returns ok. On the lens what is, I presume, the RF cam definitely doesn't follow focus. It does stop before I get to the minimum focus distance. So, it appears the RF cam is not set up for this lens? Maybe? Unless you can see soemthing else amiss. The other thing that strikes me is the lens doesn't look straight on - see second photo. Not sure if that's a problem? Thanks again.
View attachment 287281 View attachment 287282 View attachment 287283
From your photos I can see that the light baffle on the rear of the lens is either loose or glued down incorrectly. The rangefinder cam lip is catching on the baffle and not allowing it to fully retract into the lens when focusing close..
 
OP
OP
ajmiller

ajmiller

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 1, 2007
Messages
642
Location
North Yorkshire, UK
Format
Multi Format
It's fixed not loose so glued down incorrectly. I presume thats why it doesn't sit straight ( as in the 2nd photo)?
So, if it's glued it means it can't be straightened without causing damage?
Thanks

From your photos I can see that the light baffle on the rear of the lens is either loose or glued down incorrectly. The rangefinder cam lip is catching on the baffle and not allowing it to fully retract into the lens when focusing close..
 
OP
OP
ajmiller

ajmiller

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 1, 2007
Messages
642
Location
North Yorkshire, UK
Format
Multi Format
Ok thanks - there seems to be a loose edge at the top so I'll work from there. I do appreciate your help. Cheers
 

reddesert

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
2,405
Location
SAZ
Format
Hybrid
The crooked rear baffle could also potentially vignette the corners of the image (I don't know if this would be visible on a 6x9 frame), so it should definitely be repositioned.

To clarify my previous comment about the "brass ring" rangefinder cam, some of the Mamiya Press lenses, mostly shorter focal lengths, have the cam surface as a ring at the rear of the lens that rotates as the focusing helical is turned. Others have a tongue that is driven in/out by a helical, turned by the focus helical at the correct rate to move the rangefinder coupling. Yours is the second kind. The 150mm lens is also like that.
 
OP
OP
ajmiller

ajmiller

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 1, 2007
Messages
642
Location
North Yorkshire, UK
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for the useful info. I did also wonder about vignetting.
I’ll attempt to take the baffle off today and straighten it.
cheers
Tony


The crooked rear baffle could also potentially vignette the corners of the image (I don't know if this would be visible on a 6x9 frame), so it should definitely be repositioned.

To clarify my previous comment about the "brass ring" rangefinder cam, some of the Mamiya Press lenses, mostly shorter focal lengths, have the cam surface as a ring at the rear of the lens that rotates as the focusing helical is turned. Others have a tongue that is driven in/out by a helical, turned by the focus helical at the correct rate to move the rangefinder coupling. Yours is the second kind. The 150mm lens is also like that.
 

hashtagquack

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2015
Messages
115
Location
Ireland
Format
Multi Format
image1 (1).jpeg image0.jpeg Not sure if this is of any help but just snapped a couple photos of my 2.8on a Press Universal
image1 (1).jpeg
 
OP
OP
ajmiller

ajmiller

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 1, 2007
Messages
642
Location
North Yorkshire, UK
Format
Multi Format
Yes, that is useful thanks. I’ve sorted the light baffle out - the glue hadn't had time to really set so it came off fairly easily. I’m out today trying the camera so i will have a better idea after processing the film. Thanks for the advice and photos.
 

ruilourosa

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
797
Location
Portugal
Format
Multi Format
It´s a Planar not a tessar.

One of my favorite lenses!

These cameras rangefinder tends to go out of alignment, make shure to send the camera for CLA together with all the lenses you have
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom