Thanks for the replies. I don't want to open it up myself and wreck it. I've sent it out for a repair estimate.
Out of curiosity, where are you sending it? It would be nice to know who is competent on these. Mine has developed a hesitation in the lower shutter speeds (1 to 1/4, which I rarely use anyway) and I've been putting off tearing into it or having it repaired professionally. It might be nice to have mine CLAd in the near future too.
This camera is bulky and reminds me of my Argus C3 in that it is "brick-like".
It is larger than some, and it's not a lightweight. I do think it's lighter than the K1000, however.
I often thought that the styling of the SD and the Mamiya Press were intended to be similar. Let's see if the photos I'm trying to use for the comparison will show up here ...
(Hey, it looks like it worked!)
When I got my first one (I was all of 17 at the time) I thought it really looked cool, with the black face and that big eye staring you down.
My friends at the time who were into photography gave it lots of "ooo's" and "aaahh's".
It's very retro now. Somebody on RFF described the styling as that of a "cheap transistor radio" or something like that. It's definitely 60s.
The lens is razor sharp and the meter does a great job. I'd hate to lose use of it. it doesn't deserve to sit on a display shelf.
It is a great user camera, particularly for available-darkness situations. I've found that the Mamiya lens shows less astigmatism wide open than does the far more popular and widely heralded 1.7 lens on the Canon GIII.