Mamiya RZ carry options

Kuba Shadow

A
Kuba Shadow

  • 4
  • 0
  • 25
Watering time

A
Watering time

  • 2
  • 0
  • 47
Cyan

D
Cyan

  • 3
  • 0
  • 38
Sunset & Wine

D
Sunset & Wine

  • 5
  • 0
  • 41

Forum statistics

Threads
199,105
Messages
2,786,213
Members
99,814
Latest member
Terry99
Recent bookmarks
2

DCB12

Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
82
Location
FL
Format
Medium Format
I am getting a RZ setup this week and was wondering what you use to carry it around in?

It will have 1 body, 2 lenses, back, film etc...

Thanks

Peace
 

wombat2go

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
352
Location
Michigan
Format
Medium Format
The RB67 ProS was out in this bag yesterday.
 

Attachments

  • FotimaBag.JPG
    FotimaBag.JPG
    444.7 KB · Views: 201

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,399
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

Kevin Harding

Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2013
Messages
169
Format
Multi Format
I use a Lowepro Transit Backpack 350AW. It holds the RB67, 2-4 lenses, film, light meter, and other accessories comfortably. I've hauled the thing from Newfoundland to Hong Kong. Recently bought a second for a 4x5 field camera.
 

AlexMalm01

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2015
Messages
22
Format
35mm
I use a national geographic backpack. I think it's the medium one. The RZ67 with 110mm mounted, 65mm, 180, 2 120 backs, 1 polaroid back, hoods, extra film etc


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

moodlover

Member
Joined
May 19, 2015
Messages
229
Format
Medium Format
Yeah pretty much anything that will hold it cause it's a mammoth. I actually keep mine disassembled in it's original box with the foam still inside, and I just wrap the box with a towel and put it inside a large luggage bag when I get on the train. I don't think the foam is particularly the safest thing in the world but it's been working just fine for now!
 

tokam

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 7, 2008
Messages
586
Location
Sydney, Aust
Format
Multi Format
For storage and carrying around in the car I bought a Pelican style knock-off toolbox with the pluck-a-foam inserts. In Oz I found a variety at our big DIY chain. Mine cost about $40.00 and holds RZ67 with 120 back and WLF + 110mm, 180mm, 65mm, spare 120 back, lenshoods and about 6 rolls of film. You have to be a bit cunning in how you distribute the items in the case before you pluck the foam.

Beauty of this case is that it doesn't scream CAMERA. I do tend to also lug around a big old Manfrotto tripod.

If I wanted something for hiking I probably wouldn't carry 3 lenses so pick the bag of your choice.
 

film_man

Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
1,575
Location
London
Format
Multi Format
ThinkTank Retrospective 30 for my RB67. It fits as:

1. camera lying flat plus one lens. This way you can also have a prim attached OR you can lie the camera on its side and have a grip attached.
2. camera vertical plus two lenses

You can also add two back on the front pockets plus plenty of space for film, a lightmeter and the rest.

Saying that, fully loading it with two lenses and backs and extras makes it very heavy. I usually go out with just the gripped camera and an extra back.
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
Very sage advice

Get a backpack, not a side-carry/courier bag - the latter will give you serious back pain. I use a Kata 3N1-30.

I got back from a trip using my LowePro sling bag that held 7 kilos. It does kill your back. The only saving grace is the hip strap that transferred the weight to my hips. Back packs that distribute the weight evenly on both shoulders and puts weight on the hips is probably the way to go for me. But I'm an old guy with more aches.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,399
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Get a backpack, not a side-carry/courier bag - the latter will give you serious back pain. I use a Kata 3N1-30.

That is why I use a backpack. I stopped using camera bags carried on one side many years ago.
 

EdSawyer

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
1,793
Format
Multi Format
I keep mine in a LowePro Magnum AW (a few years old), it is heavy but has a nice strap. Shoulder bags in general are killers on your body but are much faster to work out of than a backpack you have to take off, put down, open, etc. If you are going somewhere to shoot as a destination, then leaving, a backpack might work fine, but for moving and shooting along the way, like a photo walkabout, a shoulder bag is much more practical in most cases.

There's also a leather everready-style case for the RZ, designed to be used with a short-ish lens (I use the 110) and the WLF. wraps up nicely with velcro closures, allows use of the neck strap, etc.

-Ed
 

polyglot

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,467
Location
South Australia
Format
Medium Format
Oh yeah, and the hip-strap is important; It is meant to carry the majority of the weight instead of your shoulders. This means that the length of the pack needs to match the length of your back otherwise it won't work right. If the weight is on your shoulders, you will still get back issues but much less rapidly than you would from a side-carry bag.
 

EdSawyer

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2008
Messages
1,793
Format
Multi Format
I have a LowePro AW200 belt pack I am thinking of trying out with an RZ setup + 1 lens possibly. It holds a Cambo Wide with viewfinder, a couple grafmatics and room for a meter or something else, without much trouble so it might fit an RZ setup.
 

Lench

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
20
Format
Medium Format
Crumpler Karachi outpost (L)
Took it on a few short hikes with my RZ kit (3-4 hours) and it was.. Comfortable-ish

Much better than any messenger bag you could buy

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom