- Joined
- Mar 2, 2011
- Messages
- 1
- Format
- Medium Format
...cut... Then I depinned an rz 110/2.8 and I use that on the rb for close focus, it is a very nice little thing, too bad it's not in the standard rb lineup.
...cut...
Not sure why consider lens choice on a single input of negativity, especially when that is based on use with 6x8 back, which is one that is kind of dubious in the RB line up anyways (it cannot be rotated). Sure, there will be a few more dissatisfied users of the 50 and possibly, it might be the one lens in the whole RB stable that may have drawn some not so universally spectacular feedback, if you look around. But, if you can get it at good price, you will also sell it at that or better. Try it, I think it is worth it.Question about 50mm lens
Keith,
I currently have the 65 and the 127. I was considering a wider lens; why do you not recommend the 50? Thanks in advance!
Never mind - I just saw your followup.
If you could only have 2 lenses for a Mamiya RB 67 what would they be?
Were you coming down from 4 x 5? Those are basically the same FOV as the vaunted 210mm & 150mm as favored by worshippers of Saint Ansel.I personally would choose 75 & 127 for basic set as far as OP question goes.
No Saints I follow, except those from NO when they are playing NE.Were you coming down from 4 x 5? Those are basically the same FOV as the vaunted 210mm & 150mm as favored by worshippers of Saint Ansel.
Ditto.65 and 127.
After that, the 210.
I would definitely not go for the 50.
I admire your spirit on both counts!No Saints I follow, except those from NO when they are playing NE.
75 and 65 is a toss, but I guess I liked it more because it was far harder to acquire.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?