Mamiya Press finder on Bessa T

Jekyll driftwood

H
Jekyll driftwood

  • 0
  • 0
  • 11
It's also a verb.

D
It's also a verb.

  • 2
  • 0
  • 23
The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 11
  • 4
  • 108
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 74

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,915
Messages
2,783,026
Members
99,745
Latest member
Javier Tello
Recent bookmarks
0

Kloppervok

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
50
Format
Medium Format
I'm very interested in obtaining a Bessa T. Since I own a 65mm finder, I was thinking of using it with the aforementioned body.

The 65mm finder is very large, and very nice, and when using the full frame, it offers a field of view equivalent to 28mm in 35mm. At least, horizontally.

However, If i wish to get a 35mm lens for the bessa, is using the 6x7 frame lines on this finder acceptable?

I know calculating coverage is not as easy as just converting equivalent FOV from one format to another, but I'd rather not have to go for over money again for another finder when i have one that I already like.

Any advice?
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
If the horizontal angle is the same, you could make a mask to crop to the more rectangular shape of 35mm film. Just use tape.
 

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
The aspect ratio of the Bessa and the 6x9 frame lines on the Mamiya are the same, so it offers a similar angle of view to a 28mm lens in small format both horizontally and vertically.

I would simply mask the 65mm finder if you want to use it on the Bessa with a 35mm lens. Black construction paper will do fine. Keep the mask's dimensions in a 1.5:1 ratio.

You should not use the 6x7 frame lines to shoot 35mm in any case, as the aspect ratio is different than the Bessa's.

You might also want to try tracking down the 75mm Mamiya Press finder.
 

InTokyo

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
10
Location
Tokyo
Format
Medium Format
Actually, there are no brightlines in the 65 finder. None at all. There's a small metal frame overlaid over the front glass which indicates the framing for 6x7 though. Parallax correction is a bit crude as well. If the accessory shoe on the Bessa is dead centre, get the black 65 finder (the old gray one has an offset shoe).

The 75 finder otoh, is rather nice, if a little bulky.
 

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
Actually, there are no brightlines in the 65 finder. None at all.

There are frame "indicators" on the 65mm finder that go as far into the image as the internal frame hash marks in the cameras' built-in viewfinder, so they are no worse than that finder. On the finder, there are no marked frame lines for 6x7, though there certainly are imaginary frame lines, the ends of which are indicated by the 6x7 frame line indicators. So, the use of the term "frame lines" seems to make sense to me. Even if they are not actually marked lines, you are still picturing frame lines to compose the shot.

Indeed, to avoid parallax error in framing, you must manually move the eyepiece as your distance changes. This is the case for most external viewfinders. I do not find it especially problematic on this finder...though it certainly ain't a Linhof finder!

...and yes, I do have the finder, so I know how it works...and so does the OP, for that matter.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom