I still struggle with composition
I'm impressed -- very nice photographs. You seem to have been able to shoot in the f/4 or f/5.6 range even in sunlight and even with a fast film, if the out of focus areas behind the subjects are anything to go on. I do like the tonality you have in these pictures -- what developer did you use? I'll go look at your prior series, and hope to see more in the future.
Really liked these.
One thing I noticed in a couple of them is an emphasis imposed by using a waist-level finder. I think the subject's knees in #2, and the subject's thighs in #3 seem slightly disproportionate. And in #7 ("Allan") the vantage point was also noticeably low. I am not saying the lower-than-expected camera angles are good or bad -- only that I happened to notice. Perhaps it is because after decades of using a 35mm SLR at eye level, my mind has become prejudiced to favor the slightly higher viewpoint?
As a recent convert to shooting with a TLR, I find myself constantly struggling to get the camera a bit higher by standing on tip-toes. In my "studio" (really just the loft of an old barn), I keep a step ladder so I can compose and focus with the TLR on a tripod at eye-level.
Brings back memories of my early days in wedding photography, where my mentors drummed into me the need to avoid the "navel-eyed view of the world".
Eye level points of view tend to be pleasing - which helps sell wedding photos.
But varying that point of view can be used carefully to add weight, presence, drama, humour, and all sorts of other really interesting elements to portraiture - which I see in lots of the OP's excellent work.
I'd share one of my examples, but not in the OP's thread.
You keep bring variety, obviously in people and location, but perhaps more importantly, surprisingly, and impressively in poses, which all appear quite natural which is delightful and not an easy thing to do.
It would be great to see your work exhibited.
Spectacular work. Well done. And I especially like the fact that they do not look like digital pics!
Really liked these.
One thing I noticed in a couple of them is an emphasis imposed by using a waist-level finder. I think the subject's knees in #2, and the subject's thighs in #3 seem slightly disproportionate. And in #7 ("Allan") the vantage point was also noticeably low. I am not saying the lower-than-expected camera angles are good or bad -- only that it's something I happened to notice. Perhaps it is because after decades of using a 35mm SLR at eye level, my mind has become prejudiced to favor the slightly higher viewpoint?
As a recent convert to shooting with a TLR, I find myself constantly struggling to get the camera a bit higher by standing on tip-toes. In my "studio" (really just the loft of an old barn), I keep a step ladder handy so I can compose and focus with the TLR on a tripod at eye-level.
Brings back memories of my early days in wedding photography, where my mentors drummed into me the need to avoid the "navel-eyed view of the world".
Eye level points of view tend to be pleasing - which helps sell wedding photos.
But varying that point of view can be used carefully to add weight, presence, drama, humour, and all sorts of other really interesting elements to portraiture - which I see in lots of the OP's excellent work.
I'd share one of my examples, but not in the OP's thread.
Interesting portraits and tattoos.
Wonderful images!
You keep bring variety, obviously in people and location, but perhaps more importantly, surprisingly, and impressively in poses, which all appear quite natural which is delightful and not an easy thing to do.
It would be great to see your work exhibited.
That is a very good explanation of what the point of view can do - and thank you very much Matt!
I'd like to o see your images if you post them!
I agree: I think portraits as good as these are largely a product of the photographer’s rapport with the subject. Very well done!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?