For the 50 you have no choice, 65 KL is rather hard to get (only 75 KL is harder). When I got into RB67 it was partly because for under a grand I got a mint SD body with 3 SD backs and 3 KL lenses (2 of them as new). So I decided to stick with KL just for that reason. But form I've been able to determine there is not going to be many times and places when a KL would be all that critical. There is no question they are newer designs with more modern coatings. More importantly, KL lenses have not had as much time for a pro abuse and thus are easier to find in great to even pristine condition. Not always are they priced al that much ower form C lenses ... with luck of course.
Also, don't be too hung up on KL floating element feature as it is only marginally useful and only in closer focusing applications. It also makes using that feature a longer focusing process, as you need to focus / move floating element / refocus ot complete the process. The latter not so much a drag anyways, as it's meant for close focusing implying tripod, mirror lock up, still kind of imaging.
If you decide to go for the 65 KL, don't forget looking for the camera instead, especially the SD body. This is how I wound up with second pristine SD body / SD back / WLF with a 75 KL on it for a mere $100 more than 75 normally sells for. But, 65 KL is just not around so much and grab it if price is acceptable.
Also (and off the subject somewhat), when shopping KL lenses, they came with compensating ring from factory. While not essential (and only "needed" on SD body) it is a pricey piece of metal for what it is and it is worth asking seller if it is not shown. Again, not essential for any application, but good to have it, if SD body ever comes into play. You can manage with just one of these for all lenses, since it is not difficult to switch from one lens to another. BTW, hood was also part of factory packaging.