Mamiya 645 Extention Tube 3 vs 3-S

Helton Nature Park

A
Helton Nature Park

  • 0
  • 0
  • 265
See-King attention

D
See-King attention

  • 2
  • 0
  • 484
Saturday, in the park

A
Saturday, in the park

  • 1
  • 0
  • 1K
Farm to Market 1303

A
Farm to Market 1303

  • 1
  • 0
  • 2K
Sonatas XII-51 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-51 (Life)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 2K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,754
Messages
2,796,162
Members
100,026
Latest member
PixelAlice
Recent bookmarks
0

aoresteen

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
659
Location
Newnan, GA,
Format
Multi Format
I've been looking at getting a couple of extension tubes for my Mamiya 645 1000s and I know that there were at least four made:

#1
#2
#3
#3-s
And the Macro spacer for the 80mm f/4 macro lens.

What is the difference between the #3 and #3-S extension tubes?

Thanks!
 

Neil Grant

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2007
Messages
548
Location
area 76
Format
Multi Format
...used tubes are usually very cheap for the M 645. They are fiddly to use. Just try comparing the working experience with that of a Nikon mount or Mamiya RB. Anyway, they are what they are. To answer your question, I believe the '3s' is the same size as the '3' but with the rear baffle slimmed down so vignetting is not cause with the 80mm f/1.9 lens. The 0.7m min focus on this lens is a real nuisance and the 45mm f/2.8 would be useful on a tube even thinner than any of those made. I'm considering a 80mm f/4 macro myself.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom