I doubt it most camera meters have a wheatstone bridge circuit so if the battery can't make the required voltage the meter drops.dead rather than give progressively worse exposure throughout the battery' s life, I think it more likely that one of the meters.needs recalibrating.That's a good question...the battery is in the body so I would assume that the signal originates from the meter when in auto mode but perhaps from the lens when in manual? There is an electrical continuum created between the body and lens when attached though and I certainly don't know enough about it to give you a definitive answer. One thing though, if you are getting divergent exposures from two bodies I would suspect that a battery might need replacing in one of them as the meter could/will give faulty readings if there is a drop in voltage.
I doubt it most camera meters have a wheatstone bridge circuit so if the battery can't make the required voltage the meter drops.dead rather than give progressively worse exposure throughout the battery' s life, I think it more likely that one of the meters.needs recalibrating.
I don't know whether the camera or the lens times the shutter. My guess is the camera since in the AE exposure mode the speeds are set with much more precision than the full stops that manual offers.
From an electronics standpoint, think about how the camera would communicate with the lens. How many contacts are there?
For a simple binary-coded shutter speed, you'd need 4 contacts for 16 different shutter speeds, plus power, ground, probably one to trigger the shutter itself, plus whatever else, maybe something for aperture value? Are there that many contacts?
Or, it could use a serial bitstream telling the lens how long to stay open, then telling the lens to open its timer, all in the space between you pressing the button and the shutter going click. The 6 is from the late 80s, same as EOS system and that had serial communication (for lens data and AF) so it's not unheard of. But I don't think this is very likely because there'd be too much shutter lag with the bauds available back then.
It's more than likely that there's just one signal from the camera being sent to open and close, and the camera takes care of the timing twixt the two.
This is even more likely if there's a B or T setting, with those the camera *must* tell the lens when to open and shut. And if it does it then, why not just put the timer in the camera and do it all the time?
I can't prove it because I don't have one in front of me to pull apart, but that's my 2c worth of Occam.
Of course, if you've got a problem in exposure, you can always grab both bodies, all your lenses, a spot meter and two rolls of Velvia (for the low-latitude, you can tell when it's out by 1/3 of a stop), shoot every combination you can and see exactly which combinations are a problem (ie, if the same lens on both bodies is a problem, or one body with all lenses)
You silently assume the communication is digital... and it need not necessarily be so. A couple of years older Bronica SQ uses analogue signalling, you just switch resistors while setting aperture.For a simple binary-coded shutter speed, you'd need 4 contacts for 16 different shutter speeds, plus power, ground, probably one to trigger the shutter itself, plus whatever else, maybe something for aperture value? Are there that many contacts?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?