• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Make Up and FAN

Forum statistics

Threads
202,527
Messages
2,841,884
Members
101,364
Latest member
CorseKDD
Recent bookmarks
1

gr82bart

Dan Dozer said:
What do some the rest of you think about all of this? When you change a model from her "raw" look, does it quit becoming fine art photography and change to Glamor photography? Perhaps that is all in the mind of the photographer.

Hi Dan,

I think this is a great question. I placed in a thread so that members can have a discussion about this.

Personally, I have taken FAN images (well, my version - not glamour) of models with none to heavy make up and props. I guess it depends on the image one is trying to capture. Light make up IMO, like Ian suggests won't do any harm for the most part.

Regards, Art.
 
I think it depends very much on what you're trying to accomplish - it could be to hide/minimize the appearance of a scar or blemish, or any feature that distracts from the final image you've envisioned. If the makeup has the end result of making the model appear like
- he/she just walked off the set of Miami Vice, Season Three
- a $30 hooker
- a cosmetics counter demonstration dummy
then it's probably NOT a fine art nude. Unless that's the look you're going for, to make a point about models in makeup.
 
I think it is ok to do what ever you want. I think any making rules for art takes away from the art. If you have a bunch of rules to follow then it becomes craft. Personally I would never ask a model to make up or shave anything. But then I hate glamour nudes.
Dennis
 
One man's fine art is another's pornography, is another's glam nude. Having said that, if it looks like the model belongs in a 50's Playboy magazine, it's probably glam. Do you want to see a true art nude? Look at Ed Weston's work. Can you tell the difference between his treatment of his girlfriend and a pepper. There is none. I would go one step further and say that art nudes glory in that which is unique in a subject, not the stylised (sp) pandering of perfect form, synthetic or genetic. Does anyone consider Diane Arbus' nudes glamour?
Who said "I don't always know art when I see it, but I definitely know when it's not"? LOL , I may not always know art, but glam is easy to spot. If you think it might be, it almost always is!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom