Maco Aura IR820C Infrared 4x5

Rouse st

A
Rouse st

  • 5
  • 3
  • 50
Do-Over Decor

A
Do-Over Decor

  • 1
  • 1
  • 83
Oak

A
Oak

  • 1
  • 0
  • 69
High st

A
High st

  • 11
  • 0
  • 98

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,231
Messages
2,788,258
Members
99,837
Latest member
Agelaius
Recent bookmarks
1

colrehogan

Member
Joined
May 11, 2004
Messages
2,011
Location
St. Louis, M
Format
Large Format Pan
I have some, but it's been a long time since I shot the Aura film. My previous exposures were mostly overexposed.

I have been shooting mostly the precision emulsion (it has the anti-halation layer, whereas the aura film doesn't). I have found that with it, I am able to get the IR effect that I like using an 88A filter. An 87 filter also works, but I haven't gotten quite the effect I like with that filter.

I have a couple of rolls of 120 that I intend to shoot using the above two filters so I can get a better idea of how to expose them.
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,245
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
We've been through this before, haven't we?

I have used both IR 820c versions, in 4x5". There is no visible difference. When you think about it, the halation only extends fractions of a millimeter from a point of light. So "Aura" makes good sense in 35mm, less in 120, hardly any in 4x5".

I used a Lee IR filter, by the way.
Dead Link Removed
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom