I'd buy some grade 2 paper. Most of my old 8x10 negatives have too much contrast for the current emulsion.
I might try a low-contrast paper developer... but it's much better to have a choice of paper grades.
Even a grade 1!
Mirko has stated that ADOX coated Lupex exactly once. Everything sold from the start through today is from that one master roll. I suspect a request for another variation won't be met with much enthusiasm, given the sales volume existing product has experienced.
Mirko has stated that ADOX coated Lupex exactly once. Everything sold from the start through today is from that one master roll. I suspect a request for another variation won't be met with much enthusiasm, given the sales volume existing product has experienced.
Not true - it was coated on the Inoviscoat machine once, but seems to have been transferred to the Marly machine in the process of bringing it online before other film/ paper projects. Without going too deeply into the photochemical 'why', a fairly hard grade of chloride paper may be easier to make on the particular machine as some routine coating addenda seem to be part of the difference between G2 and G4. Older types of coating may have similarly made softer grades easier to achieve without significant R&D.
As it is, this whole thread could be summed up in the reality that masking the neg would be a whole lot faster than trying to force Adox to R&D a softer grade of Lupex.
As they previously made Lodima already, they would have the formula, or do you imply that the peculiarities of a particular machine bring around a new R&D of sorts?
J
most modern colour paper emulsions are also very high chloride percentages too
Mirko has stated that ADOX coated Lupex exactly once. Everything sold from the start through today is from that one master roll. I suspect a request for another variation won't be met with much enthusiasm, given the sales volume existing product has experienced.
Not true - it was coated on the Inoviscoat machine once, but seems to have been transferred to the Marly machine in the process of bringing it online before other film/ paper projects...
Well, time flies, and looking back through my email Inbox reveals Mirko made that statement to me in November of 2017, so it's possible more might have been coated at Marly. I remain skeptical, however, since he's recently commented in response to other requests for "pre-paid pre-orders" (of MCC110) that ADOX has been unable to guarantee consistent characteristics.
Well, time flies, and looking back through my email Inbox reveals Mirko made that statement to me in November of 2017, so it's possible more might have been coated at Marly. I remain skeptical, however, since he's recently commented in response to other requests for "pre-paid pre-orders" (of MCC110) that ADOX has been unable to guarantee consistent characteristics.
It is not about inconsistent characteristics. The reason why we cannot offer paper is publicly available here: https://www.adox.de/Photo/mcc-and-mcp-production-situation/
The last update is the important figure. Photopaper -unlike film- never increased in price above general inflation over the past decades.
Making it a very competitively priced consumer product (especially in respect to the complexity involved in manufacturing it).
You need mass production power to manufacture something like this so cheaply.
Our current position is that we have the technical ability to do it but not at the price the consumer expects. Increasing the volumes does not help because our small machines (both in emulsifying as well as in coating) do not allow any further economies of scale.
Those would kick in if we built a larger factory.
While this is not excluded and partially actually under construction this cannot be solved by preordering one specific product in a certain amount.
So the Lupex situation in a nutshell is not about how many sqm´s people would be willing to buy but rather which is the maximum price per sqm that we can charge. Productivity in paper is 1/4th on the coater (roll diameter of thick base). The price will be -unfortunately- about double the price which is currently charged for Grade 3 (produced on a large coater).
Yes, Mirko, but has there ever been more than that one master (parent) roll of Lupex coated?
Yes, Mirko, but has there ever been more than that one master (parent) roll of Lupex coated?
Oh yes. Many more in various grades over more than a decade by now.
Sal,Either you're just playing with me, or we're not communicating very effectively.
First, a refinement to the question. Has there been more than one master (parent) roll of Lupex been coated and offered for sale since the product was introduced in 2016? If so, was Marly involved in the subsequent coating(s)?
NEW SILVER CHLORIDE CONTACT PRINTING PAPER
ADOX LUPEX is a slow speed contact fibre paper made with a silver chloride emulsion and replaces Kodak Azo or Fomalux. The speed is about 8 stops lower than MCC but therefore it is extremely finegrained and yields a superior resolution just like your large format negatives...www.photrio.com
Second, other than Grade 3, what other contrast grades of Lupex were coated and offered for sale since the product was introduced in 2016?
Yes, Mirko, but has there ever been more than that one master (parent) roll of Lupex coated?
Oh yes. Many more in various grades over more than a decade by now.
Either you're just playing with me, or we're not communicating very effectively.
First, a refinement to the question. Has there been more than one master (parent) roll of Lupex been coated and offered for sale since the product was introduced in 2016? If so, was Marly involved in the subsequent coating(s)?
NEW SILVER CHLORIDE CONTACT PRINTING PAPER
ADOX LUPEX is a slow speed contact fibre paper made with a silver chloride emulsion and replaces Kodak Azo or Fomalux. The speed is about 8 stops lower than MCC but therefore it is extremely finegrained and yields a superior resolution just like your large format negatives...www.photrio.com
Second, other than Grade 3, what other contrast grades of Lupex were coated and offered for sale since the product was introduced in 2016?
Sal,
I think the misunderstanding here is 2016. This is when we launched Lupex under the Lupex name as well. Before this time we had manufactured it internally under the Lupex name but it was under a different name in the market.
When we had to meet the requirements of the contract coater it was all about minimum coating quantities.
Now that we have everything internalised it is about staying profitable under a given cost/productivity structure.
Mirko
I cannot see why information in this detail would be helpfull to anyone. We are disclosing relevant informations to the customers but not all details. All which matters at this point is that the volume production has become unavailable due to various insolvencies/restructurations with our former partners. If LUPEX is to be coated again it has to be emulsified in Bad Saarow and coated in Switzerland. The dependencies have been highlighted above.OK, I'll try again. ADOX LUPEX was launched and offered for sale under that name in 2016. It was offered by ADOX/FOTOIMPEX as Grade 3 only. Since that time, has the ADOX LUPEX that's been offered all come from a single master/parent roll or was enough sold that it was subsequently coated again? Has ADOX LUPEX ever been offered in any grade other than Grade 3? Thanks for your patience.
Mirko has stated that ADOX coated Lupex exactly once. Everything sold from the start through today is from that one master roll. I suspect a request for another variation won't be met with much enthusiasm, given the sales volume existing product has experienced.
Not true - it was coated on the Inoviscoat machine once, but seems to have been transferred to the Marly machine in the process of bringing it online before other film/ paper projects. Without going too deeply into the photochemical 'why', a fairly hard grade of chloride paper may be easier to make on the particular machine as some routine coating addenda seem to be part of the difference between G2 and G4. Older types of coating may have similarly made softer grades easier to achieve without significant R&D.
As it is, this whole thread could be summed up in the reality that masking the neg would be a whole lot faster than trying to force Adox to R&D a softer grade of Lupex.
I cannot see why information in this detail would be helpfull to anyone. We are disclosing relevant informations to the customers but not all details. All which matters at this point is that the volume production has become unavailable due to various insolvencies/restructurations with our former partners. If LUPEX is to be coated again it has to be emulsified in Bad Saarow and coated in Switzerland. The dependencies have been highlighted above.
What is clear to me from this thread now is that LODIMA and LUPEX are one and the same paper coated by ADOX.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?