Hi, I have played with lumen printing for a couple of years, and now I would like to try exposing film instead of paper. I already put a piece of Fujicolor 200 with some leaves on under a piece of glass, and I plan to fix it in ordinary fixer (for b/w film) later today. If a picture is formed, perhaps I can print or scan.
Have anyone of you tried this? Should I use negative or positive film? Fixing as planned, or otherwise? Thanks for any advice!
i have done IN CAMERA retina prints on film. it takes a long exposure and you won't really see the image
until after you scan it sometimes
i've only done it with b/w film, never color ..
jnanian, thanks for your reply. If I read your blog correctly, you expose the film for hours in the sun, then you scan it before fixing, is that right?
/Erik
I tried again this morning, with a piece of the same film (fujicolor 200) and a piece of Tmax 400. After fixing they both have faint pictures. I'll show you as soon as they are scanned.
Hi, here are the filmstrips after fixing. They pink is Fujicolor, the grey is Tmax 400. This might be worth trying more.
The scanning software is doing a lot of interpretation of course.
hi bob
they usually make them with organic tissue type stuff because
the thing being "photogrammed" and the paper heat up and the fluids
comingle and do some sort of chemical reaction which allows them to be fixed.
solargraphs ( like 6 month long exposed pinhole photographs ) or retina prints ( in camera like i do with a lens and a few hours or days )
or photograms with non living stuff being squished with glass and heated by the sun are a bit different
because it is more of a "stain" than the comingling of "stuff"
not sure if that makes sense ?
some glass "gems" and a glass snail shell.... made this with my daughter years ago. I think we poured a little water on top of it all too
Not great or anything, but not a plant. Sort of reminds me of looking into a tidepool.
I've seen some nice salt photograms of antique lace....