At seven, it's pretty much level with the 3-packs of rebranded Kodak film sold as Fujifilm 200 or 400
My guess is that the initially suggested price point was just a case of baseless optimism to begin with. It often goes that way; the R&D process for a product starts at 100% and then when all's said and done it ends up being 160%. As product development progresses, total cost always goes up - never down.The bump in price may be due to the constant flipfloping tarrifs thats been happening the last couple months.
I'm sharing this in case anyone is interested. It looks like Chinese manufacturer Lucky is finally releasing some test photos of the new C-41 film they had made an announcement about some time ago. I remember them talking about a price point of $5.60 before, but the new article (https://petapixel.com/2025/06/20/the-first-look-at-china-luckys-new-color-35mm-film/) says it'll be more like $7.
I found some samples of size 120 and 4*5 on Chinese social media platforms.
Thanks for sharing those with us! I played a little with the first two examples:
View attachment 401304
(Blue & green channels were clipped on the highlights in this one)
View attachment 401305
Of course, inversions from photos of negatives posted on social media are never going to be top-notch...but still, all this looks like a perfectly normal, mature color negative film to me.
Cats have a way of being shocked and angered pretty much all of the time. So far the pattern I've been able to identify to it goes something like this:
* Have not received food in past 10 minutes --> be shocked & angry at evident case of starvation.
* Have not received cuddles in past 10 seconds --> be shocked & angry at lack of appreciation for continued provision of purring services.
* Have received food in past 10 minutes, but quantity insufficient (i.e. it was physically possible to finish in one sitting) --> be shocked & angry at life-threatening risk of malnourishment.
* Is in process of receiving cuddles, but strict petting protocol not adhered to with inappropriate order of petting spots, petting in pre-determined no-go areas or attempts of human to engage in other activity as petting proceeds --> be shocked and angry at gross lack of observance of protocol and thus undermining underlying relationship between cat and manservant.
* All other instances --> be shocked and angry as a matter of course.
The samples we've seen so far do not show a green base at all. Weird?its mask is notably green, making color correction more challenging than with most other films during dev and scanning.
Oh really now...hurrdurr.a high Ag level that gives it superior saturation and tonal depth compared to all other color negative films currently available
It's a bit lost in translation but interesting to note that they are selling production from a Pilot coater (small scale) according to this.The film was manually coated, and they plan to switch to a large-scale coating machine only after the emulsion formula has been improved.
Usual disclaimer that I am just a forumer, not affiliated with REFLX but they seem to be a good source for Lucky as well as respools of films including Kodak Vision and Aerocolor 220. They mention as a footer that they will sell it in line with Lucky's overseas availability.Does anyone have information on when this film is expected to be available in the United States?
Now someone needs to revive Kodak Brownie cameras, along with 127 film. For the most authentic results, leave the film box on a hot shelf for a couple years prior to shooting it, then delay the processing another two years.
For budget color film in 135/120, we have Kodak Gold 200 which is lovely. But people also like a little bit of diversity in palette, which was absent since Fijicolor's retreat. Thus I do see opportunities for Harman Phoenix, Lucky, Orwo and etc. For one, I can accept some loss of quality for a different look.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?