low light with no flash

Hydrangeas from the garden

A
Hydrangeas from the garden

  • 1
  • 1
  • 20
Field #6

D
Field #6

  • 4
  • 1
  • 49
Hosta

A
Hosta

  • 12
  • 7
  • 101
Water Orchids

A
Water Orchids

  • 5
  • 1
  • 59
Life Ring

A
Life Ring

  • 4
  • 2
  • 53

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,908
Messages
2,766,707
Members
99,500
Latest member
Neilmark
Recent bookmarks
0

ongakublue

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
117
Location
Ireland
Format
35mm
Hi guys

A couple of novice questions I think here. So I would like to shoot indoors with tungsten light or maybe some window light depending on the time of day. No Flash. I have been using film that is asa 100. I assume I can buy more light sensitive film and this yields better results? I mean 400, for example. Sorry if I misunderstand it :smile: Also during the developing which I give in somewhere to be done. Should I ask them to 'push' it higher? I have read about this.

Thanks a lot!

J
 

John Bragg

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
1,039
Location
Cornwall, UK
Format
35mm
For first timers, Ilford XP2 would be ideal. It has huge flexibility and can be exposed between Ei 200 and 800 with no loss in quality. It is essentially a mono film using colour technology. Any 1 hour lab can process it and print just like colour film with no need to push.
 

fotch

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
SE WI- USA
Format
Multi Format
The word "Better" can mean a lot of things. Nothing wrong with the 100 speed film, shoot with a tripod and cable release, and use an exposure meter.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Many years ago this was a common problem. Films were slow. There are faster films that you should investigate. The other thing would be to increase the amount of light. Do things such as replacing light bulbs with ones with greater output. Use wider lens apertures and slower shutter speeds. It is fairly easy to shoot handheld at 1/30 sec if one is carful. Tuck your elbows in, take a deep breath, exhale and squeeze the shutter gently. A tripod or beanbag can also help.

It is better to use a faster film than to push a slow one. Not what people normally think of as pushing but Kodak states that 400TX (Tri -X) can be exposed at EI = 800 and developed normally to produce good images.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,559
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Kodak still makes 200, 400 and 800 speed film in 35mm, this is daylight balanced, to shoot under artificial lights you need a color correction filter. A few labs like Blue Moon will push a film for an additional charge, you can push color 1 to 2 stops, grain becomes an issue with high speed film like the 800.

You can also buy Kodak movie film that has had the ram jet backing removed allowing the film to processed in standard color chemistry. Cinicfilm offers a 800 tungsten balanced film that can pushed to 1600 to 3200, I have not shot this film so I don't how well it will push. Freestyle, B&H, and Ultrafine sell it, on my list to try just have not gotten around to it. I believe this is the only tungsten balance film on the market, but is only balanced for tungsten, not for florescent or for matter don't know how it will respond to LED.
 

ciniframe

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
803
Format
Sub 35mm
For first timers, Ilford XP2 would be ideal. It has huge flexibility and can be exposed between Ei 200 and 800 with no loss in quality. It is essentially a mono film using colour technology. Any 1 hour lab can process it and print just like colour film with no need to push.

"Any 1 hour lab....."
Ah, there is the problem. The 1 hour lab has disappeared from most geographical locations. I would venture a guess that more than 95 percent of them have closed. Besides, the op had not indicated whether he is thinking of B&W or color. Even with B&W you really want to learn to do your own unless you have the money and wait time to send it off to a lab, with color of course ISO 800 is available and it is likely that the op would have to send it through the mails unless he is fortunate to live close enough to a lab. If so, then color or XP would indeed be the easiest to shoot.


Now that I think of it a survey on how many members live within, say 20 miles of a C-41 lab would be informative. I'd bet 80 percent of forum members don't.
 

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
Hi guys

A couple of novice questions I think here. So I would like to shoot indoors with tungsten light or maybe some window light depending on the time of day. No Flash. I have been using film that is asa 100. I assume I can buy more light sensitive film and this yields better results? I mean 400, for example. Sorry if I misunderstand it :smile: Also during the developing which I give in somewhere to be done. Should I ask them to 'push' it higher? I have read about this.

Thanks a lot!

J

everyone is assuming you are talking about B+W film but you haven't said B+W or colour. Which do you mean.

The assumption is your subjects are static. If they are moving, i.e. people then slow shutter speeds ain't likley to be the answer and it doesn't matter how still you can hold the camera if the subject is moving.

so we need more information, B+W or colour and static or moving subjects.

But as a generalsation you will need faster film speed and/or wider apertures.

And if its colour and you have tungsten light then you need tungsten balanced film and/or filters to help with colour balance unless you don't mind odd coloured results.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
J,

If you have capable smart phone, get exposure meter app for it.
At least one is available for free for iPhones.
It shows you the real view of what you are measuring.
You will learn with it in no time about ISO, aperture and shutter speed photography without flash under low light.

Once you'll learn the basics with it, read about the incident light and how to measure it.

Cheers, Ko.
 
OP
OP
ongakublue

ongakublue

Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
117
Location
Ireland
Format
35mm
everyone is assuming you are talking about B+W film but you haven't said B+W or colour. Which do you mean.

The assumption is your subjects are static. If they are moving, i.e. people then slow shutter speeds ain't likley to be the answer and it doesn't matter how still you can hold the camera if the subject is moving.

so we need more information, B+W or colour and static or moving subjects.

But as a generalsation you will need faster film speed and/or wider apertures.

And if its colour and you have tungsten light then you need tungsten balanced film and/or filters to help with colour balance unless you don't mind odd coloured results.

OK good questions. I want it for portraits. I realised that slowing the shutter speed very low won't work handheld. I am not using a tripod. The people will be still not moving. I would prefer B/W actually. I have a 50 1.4 and a 50 1.7 to play with. Thanks
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,433
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Tough conditions. Buy the fastest film you can find and learn to love grain!
 

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
OK good questions. I want it for portraits. I realised that slowing the shutter speed very low won't work handheld. I am not using a tripod. The people will be still not moving. I would prefer B/W actually. I have a 50 1.4 and a 50 1.7 to play with. Thanks

A 400 ISO film should be good then if you keep aperture as wide as you can realistically. 50mm lens is good for half to full length portraits but will work closer. An 85 1.4 would be good for head and head and shoulders shots.

Ilford delta 400 is good film as is HP5 and I'm sure people will chime in with Kodak 400 speed films too.

If you don't try and keep background sharp and aim for selective DoF to get just your subjects sharp then providing they are in reasonable light you should be OK.

If the lighting is low contrast then you can push the film one stop. i.e. use EI 800 (with 400 speed film) and tell the lab it's a one stop push. But be careful where you have people too close to windows and window is in shot becasue that can be very high contrast. So essentailly you need to consider the lighting contrast to decide whether its best to push or not. Pushing will increase negative contrast and hence print contrast which is a good thing if subject is low contrast but not a good thing if subject is high contrast.
 

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
Also if you find you're still struggling with shutter speeds which are too slow then you can try some Ilford Delta 3200 but you need to get this developed the right way for it to work well. Preferably using 120 format film but with 135 format it should be OK too.

With Perceptol use EI 800 and develop in Perceptol Stock for 21minutes @ 20deg C

With DDX use EI 1600 and develop in DDX 1+4 for 18 minutes @ 20 deg C

Delta 3200 will be more grainy than the 400 speeds films but with Perceptol it should be OK. DDX is grainier than Perceptol.

Both of the above will give you relatively normal film contrast but I would try with 400 speed film first if you can.

No faster films will give the fineness and smoothness of 100 films if that is what you were wanting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,501
Format
35mm RF
everyone is assuming you are talking about B+W film but you haven't said B+W or colour. Which do you mean.

The assumption is your subjects are static. If they are moving, i.e. people then slow shutter speeds ain't likley to be the answer and it doesn't matter how still you can hold the camera if the subject is moving.

so we need more information, B+W or colour and static or moving subjects.

But as a generalsation you will need faster film speed and/or wider apertures.

And if its colour and you have tungsten light then you need tungsten balanced film and/or filters to help with colour balance unless you don't mind odd coloured results.

My response is N/A as OP already responded.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,700
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
If the subject doesn't move or even if the subjects are people who can hold relatively still I would simply use a tripod, cable release and slow shutter speed. If I have to shoot handheld I simply give up and go to the dark side.
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,275
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
Assuming indoors with typical lighting like table or floor lamps, even window light. Don't include the light tin any light readings you make. You will underexpose because the camera sees too much light. Also if you want detail on the camera side of the subject don't have lights behind it/them.
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
Studio style lighting for movie style shots is difficult you will need to try a lot unless you are real good.

If you have good hand control you can shoot at 1/15 and get a % reasonable.

A clamp, monopod or tripod is better.

Xp2 and home process is best, you can shoot at 1600 ISO if you print yourself and don't mind digital noise.

Otherwise Tx at 400, if you push forget shadows.
 

AlexMalm01

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2015
Messages
22
Format
35mm
Personally, I really enjoy Delta 3200 for these situations. Grainy, but beautiful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom