Low contrast film + developer combination

Thirsty

D
Thirsty

  • 0
  • 0
  • 238
Cowboying up in Kiowa.

Cowboying up in Kiowa.

  • 1
  • 0
  • 327
Cowboying up in Kiowa.

Cowboying up in Kiowa.

  • 1
  • 0
  • 320
Cowboying up in Kiowa.

Cowboying up in Kiowa.

  • 1
  • 0
  • 312
Cowboying up in Kiowa.

Cowboying up in Kiowa.

  • 1
  • 0
  • 321

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,376
Messages
2,790,584
Members
99,889
Latest member
MainCharacter
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP

totò618

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
9
Format
35mm
The photographers that I've known in my life that made images the way you seem to want always overexposed the film then gently developed it. Rate Tri-X for example at 200 or even 100 then only develop it until you get the highlights that you are looking for. Probably 30ish percent less than recommended IIRC. That will give you a negative that has detail everywhere. One of my friends even went as far as water bath development with his LF negs which is a pretty extreme way of doing it. Anyway, that is how you do it. Your results will depend a lot on the light of course.

Developer choice isn't as critical as you may think it is. I'd recommend a solvent developer. Even D-76 will be fine.

Off the top of my head, Henry Wessel is probably the best example I can think of if you are looking to print your negs in the darkroom. Mark Steinmetz is another. The photographer you referenced in your OP looks to me like he scans his negs but I could be wrong about that.

great info, thanks so much for sharing. I love Henry Wessel and Mark Steinmetz, you nailed it, thanks! and yes you are right, Joshua Lutz most likely scans his negatives.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom