Low contrast developer for slow films (35mm) - am I getting this right?

patashnik

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
20
Format
35mm RF
I've shot loads of HP5+ and Tri-X over the last year or so, and rated it at anything from ISO 200 to 3200 - and developed in Xtol and Ilford Microphen. I have also done quite a bit of the Adox CMS 20 (high resolution) film, always developed in Adotech.

I like to shoot fast lenses wide open, and with summer coming up, I have to think about some slow films to help me do this. The Adox/Efke KB25 film sounds interesting, since I would like to try an "older" emulsion. I have seen negatives that have a beautiful curve, with a broad spectrum of grey tones - which I haven't been able to get with CMS 20/Adotech.

I understand that Adox/Efke 25 (and 50) are rather high in contrast, and it is recommended to use low contrast developers. Would Rodinal (1+100) work for this? Or are there others that I should check out?

I spend a lot of time on the Greek Islands every summer, so I expect high contrast lighting. With high contrast film as well - I'll need something to tame it.

Thanks!
 

lazylu

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2007
Messages
3
Format
Large Format
I think Ilford Perceptol could be a good choice. You can use it stock or maybe diluted and usually it works well for high contrast subjects.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,262
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
The Efke/Adox 25 & 50 aren't particularly high contrast, I shoot the 25 alongside Delta 100 & 400 and process in Pyrocat HD with similar dev times.
I'm mainly shooting in the same conditions you're asking about, I can see Greece from where we live

In fact I've been using Adox KB14 (now know by it's ASA speed of 25 rather than the older 14 Din) since the early 70's and have always used my usual developer.

Ian
 

panastasia

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
624
Location
Dedham, Ma,
Format
Med. Format Pan
You may get many replies on this subject. There are compensating developing techniques to produce lower contrast negatives of of high contrast subjects. I'm no expert at this.
 

Larry.Manuel

Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2005
Messages
291
Location
Kuiper Belt
Format
Medium Format
Kodak 5231 movie film stock.

I've been using Kodak 5231, which is Plus-X movie stock. It is low contrast and works well at EI 80 in D-76 1+3. Tom Abrahamsson wrote to me: "The 5231 is a good film, try it with Beutler developer 1 part A, 1 part B and 10 parts water for around 6.5 to 7 minutes. Great midrange tones.
Tom"

There is a long discussion on this film and Kodak 5222 Double-X and various developers at Rangefinder Forum. Link: http://tinyurl.com/EK5222-EK5231. There is info there on where to buy it.

I have not tried the Beutler yet. I do agree that 5231 has gloriously rich midtones.
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
I understand that Adox/Efke 25 (and 50) are rather high in
contrast, and it is recommended to use low contrast developers.
Would Rodinal (1+100) work for this? Or are there others that
I should check out?

For full film speed some compensation will likely be needed.
Rodinal at 1:200 would be a good bet. Two or three inversions
every two of three minutes will allow for developer depletion
in the more dense areas of the film.

I'd use D-23; 1:7, a 120, 500ml. D-23 has metol as it's
developing agent. Metol is bromide inhibited. As bromide,
a by product of development, builds in the more dense areas
it slows development. That plus developer depletion makes for
great compensation. In addition D-23 is a moderately active
developer so delivers fine grain. Dan
 
OP
OP

patashnik

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2006
Messages
20
Format
35mm RF
Thank you all for your helpful replies, I'll have a look around to see what I'm able to find in the local shops
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…