Thanks for everyone who got me started in camera scanning my negatives. Now using Negative Supply equipment, Negative Lab Pro and Lightroom Classic software to generate digital files. I usually print myself using an Epson Surecolor P900 using Imageprint and get results I am satisfied with but my sizes are limited to a max size of 17x22". I tend to favor matte paper such as Canson Rag Photographique or Epson Hot Press Bright. A large format printer would be a waste given the rarity of needing larger prints. However, I do want prints that are around 24 to 30" so not too large. Are there any printers in the Los Angeles area that members have used to their satisfaction? Also, what are the general protocols when working with a printer? Do I just drop off the file and let them handle color management or can I work with them to arrive at a final print? My screens are color calibrated and I can output a test print on my printer to bring to them to show my desired outcome.
It has been 9 months since the original request. I wonder where the OP ended up going and whether he was pleased with the results.
I use The Icon, they are great, but I’d recommend printing a few tests on smaller paper before launching the order. I found my calibrated monitor is a bit green in comparison to their printers
I never used their printing services but, FWIW, I wasn't thrilled with their B&W film developing. Had many issues that drove me to start developing at home.
It is always better when you process your film yourself. Labs (any lab) has only one soup for all BW film.
It wasn't so much their choice of soup, but the repeated scratches and other odd defects that were a result of their processing.
Yeah I must admit I get that sometimes with them as well, it’s usually stuff that gets cleared up with ICE but it does drive me a bit batty.
Unfortunately, ICE is useless in the darkroom, where prints should be made.
The Icon has been around for awhile. Their primary business has always been film processing (B&W, E-6, C41). They made and still make darkroom prints. So it comes as a big surprise that they do less than stellar work now. Maybe new ownership?+1
I figured most of the Icon's customers simply scanned their film and fixed defects in Lightroom or Photoshop and didn't bother complaining. It seemed unlikely that I was the only one who had issues with their processing, but they always seemed surprised when I pointed them out. I guess they were just blissfully unaware that they were messing up people's film.
So it comes as a big surprise that they do less than stellar work now. Maybe new ownership?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?