Looking for direction regarding medium format rangefinders

snay1345

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2009
Messages
96
Location
Joshua Tree
Format
Medium Format
I currently have a voightlander perkeo 2 that I inherited from a great uncle when he passed away a few years ago. I have enjoyed it alot but I was wanting to step up to a med format rangefinder that has a built in rangefinder and meter. The perkeo has neither of these and it makes it difficult to shoot photos of things that are not very still. I have a 35mm rangefinder that has a built in rangefinder and I find it much easier to focus and get good photos.

So I was wondering where should I start looking for a pocket folding mf rangefinder that has a built in rangefinder and meter? I am not sure they even exist to be honest. When I say look I mean what brands and models should I be looking for. I prefer the square size of 6x6 but any of the wider formats will work as well. Thank you for any help.
 

Chazzy

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
2,942
Location
South Bend,
Format
Multi Format
You could look at the Mamiya 6 and the Mamiya 7, or at the new Bessa III. But they are expensive cameras.
 

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
What is your budget? The Mamiya 6 is an obvious choice for a 6x6 RF, but they are relatively expensive. The next ones that come to mind would be Fuji fixed-lens RFs. They made them in 6x4.5, 6x7, 6x8, 6x9, and perhaps other sizes that I don't know about, such as 6x6.
 

MikeSeb

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
1,104
Location
Denver, CO
Format
Medium Format
Mamiya 7 or the Bessa III. Prepare to spend some cash, but I can vouch for the Mamiya 7 by personal experience. Fabulous image-making machine.
 

BobD

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
1,113
Location
California,
Format
Analog
Accessory clip-on rangefinders exist that can be attached to any camera with
a standard shoe. They don't cost much. Here is a Rondo RF on my Zenobia:

 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
Mamiya 6 or 6MF. After several years, still my favourite camera all 'round... and the only camera body that I have three of! Well worth the expense, especially when you put it up against the fixed lens new bessa. In my opinion, the 6 is rivalled/exceeded only by the considerably bulkier Mamiya 7/7ii. I like the 6 for travel, so... that was my choice.

The 7-series has the advantage of the 43mm lens, if you need it, and the 7-series 80mm is better than the 6-series 75, but the 50 and the 150 are stupendous.... and affordable.

Note: the 7-series does not fold/collapse. The 6-series does, and it gets small enough for a jacket pocket.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

photoncatcher

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
173
Location
NJ
Format
Medium Format
I'm a huge fan of the Koni-Omega rapid series. Big bright view/range finder, and really great lenses. Nothing at all against the Mamiyas, if I could have afforded one I would have the Mamiya 7 to be sure. The Koni does not have any metering, but can be had for much less than the others mentioned. For quiick shooting I always use the "sunny 16 " rule, or when I have the time, my trusty Gossen luna pro.
 

fotch

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
SE WI- USA
Format
Multi Format
My favorite for a pocketable walk around camera is my Zeiss Ikon Super Ikonta BX. Built in range finder, meter (although the meter doesn't work), 6x6 format, very sharp negatives. Heavy, not a plastic machine.

 

Attachments

  • ZeissIkonSuperIkontaBX.jpg
    39 KB · Views: 105

RobertV

Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
897
Location
the Netherla
Format
Multi Format
Mamiya 6 or 7 II or the Cosina Voigtländer Bessa III 667 where the last one you can choose between 6x6 or 6x7 but has fixed optic 3,5/80mm and is a compact folder of exactly 1000 grams.

All expensive cameras. You could also look for a Plaubel Makina with El Nikkor optic but also these cameras are expensive even available second hand only.

The Mamiya 7II and Bessa III 667 are still in production but the 7 II is much heavier and less compact then the Bessa III folder.
In optics I do not think you will see much differences. All mentioned cameras have more then excellent optics.



Bessa III and Rollei Super Pan 200 E.I. 160 in AM74/RHS.
A nice film speed for this camera.
 

craigclu

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
1,303
Location
Rice Lake, Wisconsin
Format
Multi Format
I used a Fuji folder 645 for many years and was always happy with it. It finally developed a small crack in the bellows that was quickly and inexpensively repaired at Camera Wiz with a new one. Top notch optics, too. Their new 6X7 folder requires some extra cash to obtain but is supposed to be a great performer, too. I use the Bronica RF645 and Mamiya 7 systems these days and would certainly endorse both. The Bronica is a bit handier for people shots (vertical format for candids, quick duty) but they both deliver first-class results. I sometimes miss the folder as it was so easy to slide into a jacket pocket and actually have along when things would pop up.
 

Andrew K

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
624
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Multi Format
I'd vote for the Fuji rangefinders - they have amazingly sharp optics...I've used Koni Omega's - the lenses are fantastic, but they are...how do I put it? An aquired taste.....the Mamiya press cameras are wonderful to use, but not the most compact of cameras....

As for pockatable, rangefinder and meter - if you ever come across a Makina 6x7 rangefinder at a good price then you could do much worse - Nikon lens, coupled rangefinder, built in meter.....nice cameras. Fuji 645 is my second choice if you can find one - but make sure (as mentioned before) that the bellows are OK - it's getting hard to get replacement bellows...
 

sandermarijn

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
704
Location
Leiden, Neth
Format
35mm
RalphLambrecht said:
I wish someone would make a decent 6x9 rangefinder.
Click to expand...

What about the Fuji's? I had a GSW690iii for about two years and quite liked it. The optics are a bit harsh (high contrast) for -my- b&w, so I eventually sold it. Another thing to consider with these is that they're bulky, like an oversized Leica M.

I also tried the Mamiya 7(I) w/ 80mm. Again I found the optics too harsh for b&w. Plenty sharp though and great for colour.

The OP doens't mention if he does mostly colour or b&w. To me personally this does matter A LOT. I find the Fuji and Mamiya rangefinders that I've tried great for colour but too high-contrast for b&w. The older German lenses (Rolleiflex, Hasselblad) work much better for my b&w.

I've never been able to figure out what underlies this. The type of glass perhaps or maybe the coatings- possibly both

It may also be just my imagination, this contrast-thing, but then I've seen too much of it to believe that. In 35mm I see the same difference between the Voigtlander 35mm f/2.5 and the Zeiss for Contax G lenses. Both sharp but totally different rendering of overall contrast (micro contrast/resolution is more than fine with the Contax G lenses).
 

Chazzy

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2004
Messages
2,942
Location
South Bend,
Format
Multi Format

I've heard it said that the Germans optimized their lenses for resolution, and that the Japanese optimized their lenses for contrast. It's a very broad generalization, but maybe there is a little truth in it.
 

sandermarijn

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2005
Messages
704
Location
Leiden, Neth
Format
35mm
Chazzy said:
I've heard it said that the Germans optimized their lenses for resolution, and that the Japanese optimized their lenses for contrast. It's a very broad generalization, but maybe there is a little truth in it.
Click to expand...

I think so, yes. Or maybe it's just a delusion of some (including me).

This German vs Japanese contrast issue is a bit off topic of course. It might make a nice thread on its own; if not a couple of those exist already.

Contrast vs resolution- food for hours, days, weeks, ....
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,644
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

frank

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Messages
4,359
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
Wouldn't film development play a greater role in contrast, or at least a compensating role? If one lens gives inherently greater contrast than another, simply alter the development factors to compensate for this so that the final result is to your liking.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,644
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format

With lenses, we are talking micro contrast. With development compensation, we are talking overall image contrast. Two different things. The former controls sharpness, the latter controls negative contrast range.

You do, however, have a point in so far that the subject contrast has a significant impact on lens and film resolution.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…