Hello!
I wonder if any of you have any experience with Lomography's iso400 color film in 120? I would be most grateful for your empirical findings!
Warm regards and many thanks,
Joseph
It's a glorious film -- I love the results I get on it. That said, in the US right now, it's currently $8.30/roll whereas Portra 400 is $9/roll. For my money, I'll just shoot Portra 400 as I find Portra to be better packaged and more consistent in the results. That said, if I had some Lomo 400 Color Negative lying around (or couldn't get Portra 400), i wouldn't hesitate to shoot it.
It performs like a late 1990s C41 film....no frills, no hyper saturation....possibly better exposed at 320ASA but a *very* nice film. In the UK much cheaper than Portra.
It performs like a late 1990s C41 film....no frills, no hyper saturation....possibly better exposed at 320ASA but a *very* nice film. In the UK much cheaper than Portra.