So I am going to start doing some home darkroom stuff. I just got a development canister off of ebay. I was wondering am I better of starting with liquid or dry chemistry? Which is easier to use and which lasts longer?
My advice, if you are just starting out as you say, is stick with the Ilford DD-X as some others have recommended. If you buy one liter, and really work at learing, you'll use it up way before it goes bad unless you leave the lid off. And you'll simplify your learning curve by only needing to concentrate on a few techniques.
After that, you'll be in a good position to judge what you want to do. All the arguments, pro and con, for liquid vs. dry, this developer, machines vs hand vs stand, ya-da, ya-da, ya-da, should come after you have some idea what you're doing.
Only thing I will warn you about up front is that Delta 3200 doesn't keep all that well, and the Ilford's recommended development times for that particular film are delusional. If you insist on shooting Delta 3200 develop for the next higher speed on the chart. I.e, if you shoot at 3200, develop for 6400. If you shoot at 6400, develop forever, and if you believe the paper and try to shoot at 6400 prepare for loss of shadows. The film is good (I use it) but there just ain't enough photons down there to properly expose the film.
If you like the Ilford idea, and you're really just starting out, I'd suggest a brick of Delta 400 and bottle of DD-X, follow the package directions, and then evaluate where you are after you done the 10 rolls. That will give you a lot of easy to get right first hand experience.
If you don't like the Delta-400 idea, Tmax 400 is superb film, too.
But, again, if you're just starting out, stick to a middle of the road film and developer to learn on. By the end of the first brick you'll be ready to branch out.
MB