• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Light Source Comparison

Forum statistics

Threads
203,279
Messages
2,852,239
Members
101,756
Latest member
rsj1360
Recent bookmarks
0

B Kumpf

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
1
Location
Tennessee
Format
4x5 Format
The Philips bulbs failed in my Tri Color enlarging head. With replacements cost at $25 to $30 a piece, I decided to look at different light sources.

I realigned the enlarger assembly and installed the PH212 150 Watt bulb and condenser system. I inserted a Stouffer 21 step wedge into the negative carrier, focused and locked every thing in place.

I printed a set of 5 X 7‘s using Kodak Variable Contrast for #1, #2 and # 4 filters. I added a set using Wratten Filters numbers 80C (light Blue), 49 (Dark Blue), and 40 (light green)

I switched the light source to a cobbled head assembly using a single Cree XR7090 XR series 3 watt LED. I print a set of 5X7’s for Royal Blue (455-465nm wave length), Green (520-535nm wave length), and White. The condenser set was retained.

All was printed on Kodak Polycontrast Rapid Paper developed in Ilford MultiGrade.

The step wedge prints were visually compared to a standard Kodak gray scale for a density of 0.1 and 1.9. The corresponding step number was recorded for each density.

Kodak filter should produce 5 1/3 stops for a # 1 filter and 3 stops for #4. These results are with my test error.

The Green LED produced 5.5 stop range which is comparable to a #1 filter. The Royal Blue LED compared to a #2 Filter while the White LED pushed to #2.5.


Standard PH212 150W Condenser System
------------------------------------Step Number
--------------------------Zone VIII-Zone II-No of Steps-Stops
Filter_______Exposure_______0.1____1.9___Steps___Stops
1_________30sec f11_______16_____7_____10______5.0
None______30sec f11_______16_____8______9______4.5
#2________30sec f11_______15_____8______8______4.0
#4________30sec f11_______11_____6______6______3.0



Wratten Filter
80C Lt Blue__30sec f11_______15____8_______8______4.0
40 Lt Green__30sec f11_______4_____2______13______6.5
49 Dk Blue___30sec f11_______9_____4_______6______3.0

LED's Light Source
Blue________30sec f11_______13____6_______8______4.0
Blue________60sec f11_______11____4_______8______4.0
Green_______60sec f11_______11____1______11______5.5
White_______30sec f11________7____1_______7______3.5
White_______60sec f11________9____3_______7______3.5

Hope this chart makes some sense.

I guess I will test with Halogen next. :rolleyes:

</IMG>
</IMG>
 
I do not completely understand your test, but my question is other.
As far as you know, are the white leds a possible substitute for say, the lamp of my V35 focomat (halogen 75 watts) ?
How many watts white leds are necessary to equal a 150 watts photo bulb ?

Last of my dumb questions, do lumileds get hot ?
Very hot ?
Do they need a special heat sink ?

Thank you
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom