+1 By 'stopping' with water and fixer you get uncomparable results and you never know when something is not as expected with your known developer film combinationsWell by reading your post I see you have used water as stop bath. That is never a good idea. Water doesn’t stop developer, it slows it down. Your “stop” is actually an extended development bath.
Developer and fix compete against each other and the resulting reaction is staining. Stained prints, ever saw them? You will always introduce developer in your fixer if you use a water “stop” bath which truly is a “diluted developer bath”. This will also weaken your fixer quite a bit.
A true ACID stop bath is mandatory. Stop messing around with water “stop” bath. Water doesn’t stop anything.
bingo!Yes, 5 water bath changes would indeed get rid of enough developer and avoid fixer contamination, thus staining. But then, why hassle with 5 water changes when a proper acid stop bath costs about 0.05$ and gets things done.
I hope this is not misunderstood to think that exhausted fixer can be compensated with extending fixing time;that ain't so. the silver content of fixer must be below 1g/l to be effective; best to use fresh fixer for a second fixing bath!I fix from 5 minutes for freshly mixed fixer to 10 minutes for older fixer.
The culprit is not the age of the fixer, nor its weakesv. When stains are in question, on print or on film, the culprit is the presence of developer inside the fixer.
I'm not sure of NB23's assertion that developer stains are the culprit. Even an acid stop bath doesn't wash out the residual developer. Usually, the time in an acid stop is only 30 seconds or so, not nearly long enough to remove the developer from the emulsion. Some of it gets carried over to the fixer anyway, no matter what.
Best,
Doremus
NB23,
I'll try just tossing a print straight from the developer into the fixer next time I'm printing. Still, I'm skeptical. And, it must also make a difference if one is using an acid, neutral or alkaline fix...
We haven't heard heard back from the OP to find out whether re-fixing solved his problem. William?
Best,
Doremus
The fixer bath must be saturated with developer. ...
Any fixing bath that gets so much carried-over developer as to be that saturated has almost certainly been overused, especially if there's a water bath or stop in between and one reasonably drains the negatives between steps. The amount of liquid a thin-emulsion film can hold in the emulsion itself is minuscule. In order to "saturate" a liter of fixer with carried-over developer, it would take massive amounts.
Even so, I get some discoloration in my fixer as it approaches the end of its life from PMK-developed negatives. Never any discoloration on the negatives, however.
Doremus
The exaggerated test’s only purpose is to give exaggerated results. Quick.
anyhow, I don’t know why I’m putting any more time on this issue. All has been said and it is a known fact that developer+ fixer will stain a print and will stain film.
@Doremus
I have re-fixed with fresh fixer for 3 minutes and it solved the problem.
Thanks everyone for taking the time to comment and share your experiences!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?