I've been subscribing for a few years. My subscription just ran out, and I'm debating. I see lots of beautiful stuff, and I like to read it. But if there were more film photographers included there'd be no question.
On the other hand, it's a *photography* magazine, not a specifically film one. Considering the fact that more photographers are digital than film, it makes sense that they would highlight more digital than film... whether I like that about it or not.
I think they do a great job, though, at what they put out.