Thanks everyone for your thoughts. The filter rings idea might be worth pursuing, just by using step rings instead?
I wonder if there are any square or similar shaped lens hoods out there....similar to the Xpan hood? Will look around.
I normally don't use a hood on it either but I was in Ireland where you can figure on the chance of rain more often than not.
I had a 40.5 to 58mm step-up ring on mine permanently, an ultra wide angle hood from a Sigma lens and a Sigma cap https://www.120folder.com/plaubel_veriwide.htm hood not pictured....
I bought an early version (bar levels) with the original finder twenty years ago, shot a few rolls, then put it away -- it didn't really help me at the time, because I was shooting mostly portraits.
Alright, two more people with the Brooks Plaubel Veriwide 100! I thought it was just me.
I go w/o a hood.
Somehow, I don't think Melanie would have appreciated you using the Veriwide for your photos of her
I had a 40.5 to 58mm step-up ring on mine permanently, an ultra wide angle hood from a Sigma lens and a Sigma cap https://www.120folder.com/plaubel_veriwide.htm hood not pictured....
I had a 40.5 to 58mm step-up ring on mine permanently, an ultra wide angle hood from a Sigma lens and a Sigma cap https://www.120folder.com/plaubel_veriwide.htm hood not pictured....
It doesn't function as a shade itself. You need to find a shade that works. I used a modern plastic shade of an ultrawide Sigma Lens...Do you really feel that this functions as a shade or just a convenient way to use filters and caps without more vignetting?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?