That's a well done test, and the conclusions match my own experience.
OK, so I understand that there are good and less good filters; and that even the best filters add two extra surfaces that will contribute to flare.
I don't see how asking my question blows anything out of proportion. Out of proportion to what? Can I not just be curious to know?You, like many others, have blown this out of proportion. You'd need some sort of scientific test to determine if a filter SIGNIFICANTLY contributes to flare. Of course it will, but does a 1% increase matter to you? How about 2%?
You need to find something more important to worry about.
I don't see how asking my question blows anything out of proportion. Out of proportion to what? Can I not just be curious to know?
Maybe we are confusing amount with probability?Of course you can!
Ignore the first sentence and replace “SIGNIFICANTLY” with “NOTICABLY” and it reads a bit easier.
I think Jason Lane belongs to this forum.
Yup, a correct (the KEY word) lens shade is the best way to control flare. Someone who spends more on expensive filters, but doesn't use a lens shade (MUCH cheaper), is missing the target.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?