Frankly, the material you choose for your board depends on the lens you wish to mount. The heavier the lens, the more likely a material such as hardboard, low-grade plywood (lauan), or even plastic is to flex, which will mess up focus. But those materials would be fine for something like an Ektar 127 in a Supermatic shutter.
If you want to mount a heavier lens, particularly if it sticks out more than 2 inches or so, you'll want something stronger. Like aluminum.
Wouldn't that depend on the format? For example 4x5 has a smaller board that seems would be stiffer and stronger than the same heavy lens mounted on an 8x10.
Luan underlayment? Never seen that; and I was a buyer in a major construction supplies firm for 40 yrs. Must be a regional thing.
A long long ways from my first little $25 Black and Decker 1/4"router.
Sears Craftsman router and a set of their HSS bits,
It would appear one also needs to check the depth? height? of the actual mounting threads on the shutter. I cannot mount the 240mm on the thicker board as the retention ring will not grab any threads on the shutter. Oh well. I think I am going to steer towards standardizing around Technika boards. I can get out and shoot with what I have so far (although it's pissing rain today) but I'll continue to scan various places for bits and bobs as needed.
Wouldn't the offset also reduce the amount of tilt and fall since the image circle is in another area rather than centered?
I bought a couple of lenses with the offset and replaced them with a center hole board from Chamonix just to standardize. It made me feel more comfortable even though people said it doesn't matter, much.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?