I actually paid $200 for mine and then another $70 to have it cleaned to basically new condition. I think thats a great price to pay for a lens with consistent and expected quality. The jupiters are so poorly assembled I'll never know if im buying rotten meat. Also they have horrible ergonomics and are likely to fall apart in use. They do perform well with all variables in check though, I agree.
The Canon has softer corners wide open than modern lenses. I'd take one over a J12; better ergonomics, particularly the aperture, fewer flare problems than the J12s I've used, more consistent construction.
.
I'm resurrecting this thread in the hope I might get an answer to a couple of questions about theses lenses.
Does anyone know the filter size for these?
What is the filter size for the later black version of the lens?
Since the thread got resurrected I thought I would say that my prediction came to be accurate. Someone gave me a couple of Leica cameras that I would never buy and the M3 came with one of those 35mm lenses with the goggles. That combo is too heavy but the other camera was a IIIc and I really wish I had the canon lens to use on it. At least I got $280 for it when it sold with the external viewfinder.I am selling one on ebay right now for exactly what you paid with the cleaning. I think it is a fantastic lens as well but I just can't find any joy using range finders with tiny finders. It does render beautifully even with old foggy film. I am sure one day when I find an awesome RF with a huge viewfinder I will be bitter with myself for selling it.
sent from phone. excuse my typing.
Lovely images, thanks for sharing.
From online scouting I *think* the black barrel version is 40mm (and 40 - 40.5mm step-up rings are available).
I own some 43mm filters. I doubt 40 - 43mm step rings exist sadly.
Since the thread got resurrected I thought I would say that my prediction came to be accurate. Someone gave me a couple of Leica cameras that I would never buy and the M3 came with one of those 35mm lenses with the goggles. That combo is too heavy but the other camera was a IIIc and I really wish I had the canon lens to use on it. At least I got $280 for it when it sold with the external viewfinder.
40.5 to 43 definitely exists.
Also found 40 to 43 on Ebay http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-40-43mm...040614?hash=item2efcfe9de6:g:DxYAAMXQdGJR1LbN
Mine came with a bunch of filters of thread size 34mm that fit just fine.
Don't know about the black-barreled version, but my Canon 50mm f/1.8 Type-6 (Serenar optics, black barrel body) uses 40.5 thread which I used a step down ring to 37mm.
Edit: I do not see a black barreled 35mm f/2.8 but I see a couple f/2 and faster. Two of them are listed as 40mm (probably actually 40.5mm) and one listed as 48mm thread.
http://global.canon/en/c-museum/series_search.html?t=lens&s=s
40.5mm is NOT a Canon filter thread size, so do not try to force a 40.5 mm size filter or adapter into these threads!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?