Leica rangefinder flare?

Mark Crabtree

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
782
Format
Large Format
I apologize if you took my comment as an insult. I was saying that perhaps there was something to your post other than BS and have edited my post to make that more clear. Nonetheless, I don't think people are likely to respond well to the implication that there is only one proper way to use a Leica.

This thread was about rangefinder flare, which is clearly not an interest that you have.
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,542
Format
35mm RF


+1
 

DavidBrunell

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2012
Messages
230
Location
Lake Orion,
Format
Multi Format
I have owned (4) leica M6's and (1) MP. The rangefinder flare is not as much of a problem as people make it out to be. I still have an M6 that flares once in a while, it is not a problem. I will say however that the patch was much more contrasty in the MP.
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF

Hi

When I got an M4 back from a shutter replacement service, the docket said something like also 'fitted a finder enhancement to reduce flare', think it was a factory suggested modification. It never flared like a M6 either before or after the service, the M2 and M3s never flare like a M6...
An early M4-2 never flared like a/my M6.
My M6 would flare with a light source in top right part of scene just outside 5cm 24x36 frame, but only the rangefinder spot flared, it went 100% white. The M6 had bad zinc rot as well.
Leica did not seem overly concerned about customer satisfaction, but now MPs are nice.
My French is not so good...

Noel
 

clogz

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
2,383
Location
Rotterdam, T
Format
Multi Format
The solution: http://www.leicagoodies.com/ Look under 'shade' and your problems might be solved. Then again there is the zinc rot...... Go and load your camera with film and don't worry....
 

mhcfires

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
593
Location
El Cajon, CA
Format
Multi Format

thomasw_

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2007
Messages
42
Location
Kimberley, BC
Format
35mm RF
I love my M2. I think it is a much better camera than the M6.

I agree, much prefer the m2/3/4 VFs over the later brothers. Any VF irritation is to be avoided if it can be as far as I am concerned; this includes having no blinking, distracting/red-haze-causing lights in my M's VF for me! In my experience, the m6 flare was situational -- but when it occurred, it ruined the shot. If you shoot in situations where it occurs, it could be a hassle for you, too. That situational possibility noted, the M6 to MP VF upgrade is still a great deal less than buying a MP; you end up with a camera that is functionally the same as a M6 with one exception: the MP light meter is one stop more sensitive than the standard M6's. Yet using either a M6 or a MP meter in low light is a no-go for me -- it blinks and produces a red haze -- which has caused me to lose shots. Much prefer how the all-mechanical M's VFs just let me think, compose and shoot
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
Hi

I normally use IXMOO & MPs dont do IXMOO, but if you are worried by the red glow leave the battery out, but I dont have any problems with the M2 or M3 finder even if the cover glass is not coated.

Noel
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…