i have an r4 that has been a sad disappointment-- consistently under exposes. I wish you good luck -- I understand the r5 was a vast improvement. They're so cheap I am sometimes tempted to just get one, but it makes more sense to just keep using the sl2.
i have an r4 that has been a sad disappointment-- consistently under exposes. I wish you good luck -- I understand the r5 was a vast improvement. They're so cheap I am sometimes tempted to just get one, but it makes more sense to just keep using the sl2.
I read that spme R4 had problems but if the underexposure is constant I think it's could be easy compensate for it (if not possible to recalibrate).
Btw. thanks for the luck.... but R5 is not mine....!