In the distant past I think I've owned every body from the original SL to the R5. Finally settled on the SL2. Yes the bodies are relatively cheap.So, the Leica R series has recently piqued my interest. I've done a small bit of reading and can see that bodies are (relatively, in Leica terms) cheap
Cheers
Yeah, I've noticed the lenses are getting thereIn the distant past I think I've owned every body from the original SL to the R5. Finally settled on the SL2. Yes the bodies are relatively cheap.
The lenses are not.
Here's the thing. I have modern AF film cameras (Minolta 7). I also have MF cameras. I find myself reaching for the MF cameras probably 7 times out of 10. I suppose it's what I prefer.In my humble opinion an SLR without the modern bells and whistles is more feeling than a common sense.
Feeling is important. How you feel while you shoot is very important. But for me I rather have a modern autofocus SLR.
Yeah, I've noticed the lenses are getting there
Here's the thing. I have modern AF film cameras (Minolta 7). I also have MF cameras. I find myself reaching for the MF cameras probably 7 times out of 10. I suppose it's what I prefer.
Cheaper alternative: Minolta XD11. Prety much the same and has some great glass. Shoots 100 if the battery dies.
Leica R lenses are way too expansive because of Video people value them,
What systems to video people use them on?Why do video people value them? Because they are awesome.
One of these days I want to get an R8. I love the look of these things, black with the slim auto winder. 3 lenses? 28/35, 50, 90? Or the zoom?
One of these days I want to get an R8. I love the look of these things, black with the slim auto winder. 3 lenses? 28/35, 50, 90? Or the zoom?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?