Hi,
I'm looking for a long-ish lens for my R8 so have been looking at the 135-180mm range. From what I see my options for my are:
135/2.8 version 1 (about £150-200)
135/2.8 version 2 (about £200-250)
180/2.8 version 1 (about £300)
180/2.8 version 2 (£400-500)
180/3.5 APO (£600+ which is kind of stretching it too much)
180/2.8 APO (£2k+ crazy money not interested)
180/2 APO (£5k crazy money not interested)
From what I have read, the 180/2.8 v1 is not much good so I would rather look between the 135/2.8 v1 & v2 and 180/2.8 v2. My question is, are these two lenses any good and how would they compare to the 35 and 50 Summicrons that I have. I can't find much on the 135, is that an indifferent lens? Also what are the differences between the v1 and v2?
The 135 would probably be my preferred length as it kind of gives me a good jump from 50 (longest I have now) without getting in the long range the 180 is. However if it is not good as a lens I'd rather pass and get the 180.
Thanks
I'm looking for a long-ish lens for my R8 so have been looking at the 135-180mm range. From what I see my options for my are:
135/2.8 version 1 (about £150-200)
135/2.8 version 2 (about £200-250)
180/2.8 version 1 (about £300)
180/2.8 version 2 (£400-500)
180/3.5 APO (£600+ which is kind of stretching it too much)
180/2.8 APO (£2k+ crazy money not interested)
180/2 APO (£5k crazy money not interested)
From what I have read, the 180/2.8 v1 is not much good so I would rather look between the 135/2.8 v1 & v2 and 180/2.8 v2. My question is, are these two lenses any good and how would they compare to the 35 and 50 Summicrons that I have. I can't find much on the 135, is that an indifferent lens? Also what are the differences between the v1 and v2?
The 135 would probably be my preferred length as it kind of gives me a good jump from 50 (longest I have now) without getting in the long range the 180 is. However if it is not good as a lens I'd rather pass and get the 180.
Thanks
Last edited by a moderator: