• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Leica M or Leica IIIF?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
203,370
Messages
2,853,579
Members
101,805
Latest member
itsallart
Recent bookmarks
0
That isn't how gallerists make their decisions amongst the floods of submissions and recommendations they work through.
And many visitors to a show appreciate additional information.

Well jolly good for them. Can you imagine asking Atget or Van Gogh, or Leonardo to make an artist statement?
 
If I am viewing an exhibition of images by HCB, I don't need him to make any artists statement.

Might have some difficulty getting him to make any, now.

Well jolly good for them. Can you imagine asking Atget or Van Gogh, or Leonardo to make an artist statement?

Yes. They all needed to convince people that their work was worthwhile. Atget and Van Gogh didn't have much in the way of success as artists when they were alive.
 
Sometimes, the technique has some relevance to the vision, as it relates to the form of presentation.
Jeff Wall comes to mind, as does Alexey Titarenko.

From the biography section of one of my most recent Artist Statements:

"Matthew’s photography is almost entirely film based. He finds inspiration in the world of the photographic darkroom - primarily with black and white film and light sensitive, photographic paper. He is particularly inspired by the challenge and reward of the photographic print."

😄
I'm not sure how your process helps a viewer or curator better understand your work. Most artists's statements center on ideas and intentions. And unless a collector concentrates on process, they care about the image and not about how it was made.
 
Well jolly good for them. Can you imagine asking Atget or Van Gogh, or Leonardo to make an artist statement?
Artist's statements are relatively new, although groups or schools of artists would issue manifestos in the recent past. I believe the individual artist's statement originated with the abstract expressionists. Today, when gallerists, curators and publishers no longer look at unsolicited work, an artist's statement is essential once you get your foot in the door.
 
FWIW, @cliveh added his reference to HCB after I started quoting his post.
An artist statement would be much less important for HCB than it would be for someone not well known.

It's one thing to briefly state what motivates your work and I stipulate that this can be a useful marketing tool.

But the statement shouldn't be some art school pontification on visual intersectionality of postmodern, poststructuralist feminist garbage can theory. Some of this stuff is mind bogglingly self important.

But I do think the work should mostly speak for itself (or not, as the case may be). To me, if you have to read the artist's statement, it's analogous to telling a joke: Humor explained isn't funny.

I don't exhibit publicly (well, almost never), but when I show my work to those I know/privately, I never explain what I am trying to accomplish unless they ask after they have looked at it. I get the inevitable "What kind of camera do you use?" as the most common question. Right after that I get, "How do you see these things?" (I do a lot of abstracts.)

I don't mind answering these and other questions about how I work, the equipment, the darkroom or what have you, I just don't want them to know this first. I work 99.9999% only for myself. When I do show the work to others, I'm interested in how they respond and to which images, and how that differs from my own response. I am most gratified when the viewer's sensibilities match my own. Mind you, I'm not working with them in mind, but if an "outsider" gets what I am doing, it means I have something in common with my fellow man, and have not yet gone stark raving mad ... you may see it otherwise ...
 
It's one thing to briefly state what motivates your work and I stipulate that this can be a useful marketing tool.

But the statement shouldn't be some art school pontification on visual intersectionality of postmodern, poststructuralist feminist garbage can theory. Some of this stuff is mind bogglingly self important.

But I do think the work should mostly speak for itself (or not, as the case may be). To me, if you have to read the artist's statement, it's analogous to telling a joke: Humor explained isn't funny.

I don't exhibit publicly (well, almost never), but when I show my work to those I know/privately, I never explain what I am trying to accomplish unless they ask after they have looked at it. I get the inevitable "What kind of camera do you use?" as the most common question. Right after that I get, "How do you see these things?" (I do a lot of abstracts.)

I don't mind answering these and other questions about how I work, the equipment, the darkroom or what have you, I just don't want them to know this first. I work 99.9999% only for myself. When I do show the work to others, I'm interested in how they respond and to which images, and how that differs from my own response. I am most gratified when the viewer's sensibilities match my own. Mind you, I'm not working with them in mind, but if an "outsider" gets what I am doing, it means I have something in common with my fellow man, and have not yet gone stark raving mad ... you may see it otherwise ...
Artist's statements are usually not for public consumption except maybe in books. They are a marketing tool to facilitate communication and understanding of a group of images or a project, usually directed to a curator, juror or gallerist. And that audience can usually see through art-speak. Photographers love to talk process, gear, etc. The general viewing public doesn't give a rat's ass.
 
The work may speak for itself. But you need to get someone to listen to it.
 
An artist's statement is a crutch for their work.
 
Artist's statements are usually not for public consumption except maybe in books. They are a marketing tool to facilitate communication and understanding of a group of images or a project, usually directed to a curator, juror or gallerist. And that audience can usually see through art-speak. Photographers love to talk process, gear, etc. The general viewing public doesn't give a rat's ass.

That's a fair observation, but I'm not sure I agree with the latter sentence. It seems when people see my work, all the want to know is what kind of camera, how it all works, etc. There remains a fair fascination about chemical darkrooms.
 
That's a fair observation, but I'm not sure I agree with the latter sentence. It seems when people see my work, all the want to know is what kind of camera, how it all works, etc. There remains a fair fascination about chemical darkrooms.
I rarely if ever have been asked about the camera or process I use. Maybe because I don't make photos where the process dominates the image. Also, I would be dubious about anyone asking me what kind of camera as that somehow makes me think they believe the camera is responsible for the image.
 
That's a fair observation, but I'm not sure I agree with the latter sentence. It seems when people see my work, all the want to know is what kind of camera, how it all works, etc. There remains a fair fascination about chemical darkrooms.

That's in conversation with you, though. If your photos are being viewed by a public that doesn't involve you, they're not likely to talk about the camera used.

Also, it's easy to talk about the camera used when you feel you should talk about something but find nothing in the photo to discuss.

Most people can't find much to discuss in photos that are unrelated to their personal lives.
 
I rarely if ever have been asked about the camera or process I use. Maybe because I don't make photos where the process dominates the image. Also, I would be dubious about anyone asking me what kind of camera as that somehow makes me think they believe the camera is responsible for the image.


People do, in fact, believe exactly that more often that I'd care to believe. Social media is full of questions in the form of "I own this very expensive camera. They just came out with a slightly more expensive newer model. Should I buy it? Will I take better pictures with it?"
 
An artist's statement is a crutch for their work.

Perhaps it is, for some people. It may also do more damage than good, for some people. You can make interesting things banal by discussing them - probably more easily than the other way around.
 
Perhaps it is, for some people. It may also do more damage than good, for some people. You can make interesting things banal by discussing them - probably more easily than the other way around.

I rest my case.
 
You don't use an Artist Statement if you are aiming your work at photographers or those interested in photography as a pastime.
You use an Artist Statement if you are aiming your work at those who are first interested in Photography as Art, or just interested in visual Art.
Curators and gallerists and knowledgeable critics and academics are amongst the latter.
And people who go to museums and galleries and public display spaces to see and experience and learn about Art, they also get benefit from a good Artist Statement.
 
People do, in fact, believe exactly that more often that I'd care to believe. Social media is full of questions in the form of "I own this very expensive camera. They just came out with a slightly more expensive newer model. Should I buy it? Will I take better pictures with it?"

People are always asking me "Wow, what kind of camera did you use." LOL Usually shuts them up when I say, "Just an old film camera."
 
People are always asking me "Wow, what kind of camera did you use." LOL Usually shuts them up when I say, "Just an old film camera."

It's funny, though, how brand aware people are and how much some of this stuff has gotten into the popular zeitgeist.

I have been approached any number of times with people saying things like "Is that a Leica?" or "Is that a Hasselblad?" These brands have etched themselves into the popular mind somehow. I expect Leicas in the movies and Hassy on the moon may have had something to do with it.

Then there was the time I was shooting at sunset with a 4x5 Wisner at the rim of Bryce Canyon in Utah. A tour bus full of Germans stopped. A few of them padded over to ask (very politely) what I was doing and why and how and ... I let them peer under the dark cloth and they were apparently quite impressed by it all.

Some people are offended when asked "What kind of camera did you use?" presumably because they think their Artist-ness is being impugned. I see it as an opportunity to evangelize for this passion of ours.
 
I’ve found this to be quite useful for “writing” an artists statement.

Hours of fun…
 
For the sake of completeness and as a reference for historical purposes, it should be noted that while the Voigtlander Nokton 35/1.4 is noted for its focus-shift (it is, alter all, a pretty straightforward copy of the Leica Summilux 35 pre-aspherical), the second version of the lens, cleverly named Voigtlander Nokton 35/1.4 II, has virtually no visible focus shift.
They managed to “shift” the shift to higher apertures where it is covered by the increased depth of field.
Lovely lens.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom