Kminov,
your Leica makes nice photos and you have a cool avatar...BUT...my question is about b/w! I don't shoot color!
Would you be able to provide b/w samples?
Sorry, it was a friends leica, I don't own one, and it was just a couple of expired film rolls I put through it. I thought it might be helpful though, even being in color.
I occasionally refer film neophytes to this site for a quick upskill..
You, 'Gentlemen",and I use this term derisively, are a Disgrace. Hie yourself off to a Low Tavern,and conduct your shabby disputes to a more receptive audience.
What a load of dreck.
A casual observer would associate this kind of invective with the blind belief that German optics would have turned WW2 into a different,more positive outcome.
Absolutely!it's been positive enough for me, I get the right to have an opinion and communicate it freely.
I occasionally refer film neophytes to this site for a quick upskill..
You, 'Gentlemen",and I use this term derisively, are a Disgrace. Hie yourself off to a Low Tavern,and conduct your shabby disputes to a more receptive audience.
What a load of dreck.
A casual observer would associate this kind of invective with the blind belief that German optics would have turned WW2 into a different,more positive outcome.
^^^Agreed. Move on.
Anyway, the Leica lenses aren't half as good as the Zeiss ZFs :munch: There, that ought to keep this thing going another 10 pages
I hope all this negative press as to Leica lenses kills the resale value of them; maybe to the point of those terrible Asahi M42s. Also, those Leica bodies are really over rated and a Kodak Pony is far better. Anyone want to sell me trashy M3 with lenses for maybe $50.
I've never found anything in 35mm that equals or surpasses the quality of my Leica lenses - either optically or mechanically.
John
You dug up a post from a year ago? You are pathethic, took me a week to learn that and move on, since then I've done enough research, I've studied basically non-stop since then, so I know better, unlike you it doesn't take me 30 years to learn insignificant basic things such as sharpness of lenses (for example) you fool, and unlike you, if I do have a question I immediately ask, I don't muck around, and I do have more common sense then you to understand when I spot an idiot. So I just call them as I see them. As I said, you are a bit of a joke and you should learn to separate OPINION from FACT, when you do this, come back, until then, step away from the keyboard. Just like a bunch of other people have said already.
Here is you spot on;
Amateurs worry about equipment, pros worry about money, masters worry about light.
go, baby, go! yeeeee-haaaaaaawwww!
ps. all i worry about is immortality and a drink along the way every now and then--what does that make me??
The overall quality of Leica lenses is simply the best
1:5,6 is something I rarely reach with prime lens.I feel most people shoot at apertures greater than 5.6 for the bulk of their photography. I realize the "wide open" fad is important to some but for me I only shoot wide open on the very rare occasion when the image I want to create demands that type of look.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?