• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Leica 90mm lens options

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,469
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
Can anyone give me a good reason why I should but a second 90mm lens, El Cheapo from the bland days of Minoltastan? I want one! But does it make any difference? I have a EVF2 for my digital M bodies so not much concerned about focus issues.
 

loccdor

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2024
Messages
2,546
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
It seems the lens you have is better and already pretty small. I don't think it's worth getting the other.
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,469
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
So i found the support in this forum a bit disappointing.
But I bought one.
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,469
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
Last November, during a quiet phase of transition, I went to Wetzlar and came back with a Leica M Monochrom (the M240 version). It wasn’t a planned purchase so much as a reaction. I just knew I needed something deliberate, simple, and stripped of distraction.

Along with it, I picked up an old Elmar-C 90mm f/4 — my first M lens. Nothing fancy, just the plain little lens that happened to be there. People online say it’s soft, or that it has rangefinder coupling quirks. Maybe it does. But it’s honest glass, and that felt right at the time.

It was a grey afternoon — fitting for a camera that only sees in black and white. I had dinner at the Leitz Park hotel afterward, didn’t take any pictures. It felt more like a quiet ceremony than a purchase.

Since then, I’ve used the Monochrom sparingly. Some days I think I’m still learning to deserve it.

Anyone else ever buy a camera not because they needed it, but because it marked a turning point — something you just had to do to move forward?
 

250swb

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
1,595
Location
Peak District
Format
Multi Format
RezaLoghme said:
Anyone else ever buy a camera not because they needed it, but because it marked a turning point — something you just had to do to move forward?
Click to expand...

Not really, I think a turning point is choosing left or right at a crossroads, and we know what temptations there are at the crossroads (look up 'Crossroads Blues', Robert Johnson). Moving forward is going straight on with a destination in mind, so I wouldn't buy a camera (anymore) if I didn't have a use for it. And years ago I thought I needed a Leica Monochrom but sold both my MM and M246 because they reminded me why I like film for B&W better than digital.
 
  • MattKing
  • Deleted
  • Reason: wrong thread

skahde

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 16, 2004
Messages
669
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I own one and love it. Sharp and nice rendering. Colors are as expected from a single coated lens fron the era.
 

PrairiePhotographer

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
35
Location
Illinois, USA
Format
4x5 Format
I have a 90mm Summicron version 1. When I’m using it well, it takes amazing photos, both on my M3 and digitally on my Fujifilm X-T2. I wish it was a bit lighter. There are many times I wish I had it handy but I don’t because of its weight. But overall, I think it is magic
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,461
Format
4x5 Format

mshchem

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,936
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
Yep, 1st generation Summicron made by E. Leitz Canada, absolutely beautiful in silver finish, collapsible lens hood, built in tripod mount and could be had for a few hundred.
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,469
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
I believe that every photographer should own one Elmar-C 90/4:

1. It works for potrait as well as landscape
3. Is one of the smallest if not the smallest 90mm (exlcuding the collapsible one which does not work properly on digital M b odies)
4. Is cheaps as chips - cheaper than an artisan made half case or silk rope strap
5. Can be easily replaced as so many are around
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,469
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
This thread is now the spiritual home of Leica M 90mm lenses.
 

craigclu

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 8, 2002
Messages
1,326
Location
Rice Lake, Wisconsin
Format
Multi Format
I've had a few 90's go through my hands over many years. I've kept the Tele-Elmarit M ƒ2.8 as it's so compact and quite sharp. It also behaves well on my Fuji X gear which is not universal in my experience with heritage glass.
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,469
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
90mm is the ideal "only" lens.
You can use it for portraits, architecture, landscape.
just use your feet as a zoom.
 
Last edited:

GregY

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,980
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
RezaLoghme said:
90mm is the ideal "only" lens.
You can use it for portraits, architecture, landscape.
just use your feet as a zoom.
Click to expand...

I've had a least 6 over the years.... Summicron, Elmarit, Tele-Elmarit, Elmarit M,fat tele-elmarit, Elmar C .....
They're ideal when you need them. At the same time....it is the lens i've used the least & could live without.
As for architecture.... there are lots of places you just can't back up enough.....
It's the last lens i would choose as an "only" lens.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,469
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
GregY said:
As for architecture.... there are lots of places you just can't back up enough.....
Click to expand...

Yeah but at the same time often the whole building has been photgraphed many times already, so focussing on details is a much better option.
 

GregY

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,980
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
RezaLoghme said:
Yeah but at the same time often the whole building has been photgraphed many times already, so focussing on details is a much better option.
Click to expand...

It depends on location and intent. If it hasn't been photographed by me...I'm looking at what i want to photograph. I'm generally more interested in the building than the details alone

 
Last edited:

Patrick Robert James

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 31, 2012
Messages
3,414
Format
35mm RF
I have two 90s. A Minolta-M 90 from the CLE days and a Jupiter 9 from the late 50s. The Jupiter has slight focus issues, but it does make a nice image for what it is. The Minolta leaves nothing to be desired aside from more speed. Great little lens. I'll probably get something modern and fast at some point. I used to have a Contax Sonnar and that was nice but adapting it was more pain than it was worth really. I do kind of miss it though.

I am mostly a 50 guy, but if you see with a 90 then go with it. No reason not to really. I use a 90 more than the 35 for example.
 

Arthurwg

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
2,953
Location
Taos NM
Format
Medium Format
I've never been comfortable with longer lenses on rangefinder cameras. To me, they are best with normal and wides. But if I did go for a 90, I'd go for a screw mount.
 
OP
OP

RezaLoghme

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 6, 2024
Messages
1,469
Location
Europe
Format
Medium Format
Arthurwg said:
I've never been comfortable with longer lenses on rangefinder cameras. To me, they are best with normal and wides. But if I did go for a 90, I'd go for a screw mount.
Click to expand...

Why and which?
 

Arthurwg

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
2,953
Location
Taos NM
Format
Medium Format
After three weeks shooting my IIIF on holiday, I remembered how much fun it is. Maybe the Elmar F4. At $95 it's a give-away.
 

rulnacco

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
278
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Format
Medium Format
I have both the Version 2 (chrome) and Version 3 (pre-ASPH) 90mm Summicrons. The V2 is a huge, heavy cannon, so I never used it very much (and it's up for sale, actually, at present). The V3 is more compact, but still chunky and heavy. It's not exactly super sharp at either f2.0 or 2.8 either.

I keep thinking I might one day trade it toward the 90mm/f2.8 Elmarit-M, which is probably as sharp or sharper at f2.8 as the Summicron is--and is a good bit lighter.

If you want to go really light, the thin 90/2.8 Tele-Elmarit is probably your best bet--I owned one for a while with a slightly dodgy front element, and I loved the size and it was decently sharp despite its condition. I also once owned the early-60s 90mm/2.8 Elmarit, and it was actually a pretty good performer, too, and not terribly heavy--optically, it's probably at least 90% as good (no pun intended) as any modern lens and is built extremely well.

I've never owned the "fat" Tele-Elmarit, but I know people who have and they were also quite pleased with its performance. Maybe not the lightest of Leica's 90s, but possibly the most compact of the faster lenses. They, and the early Elmarit I just mentioned, are probably the cheapest options for 2.8 or faster lens if you go that way.

Another possibility, which I've been a bit intrigued by, are the Voigtlanders: the Apo-Lanthar and Apo-Skopar. Anyone here used those and care to comment?
 

Arthurwg

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
2,953
Location
Taos NM
Format
Medium Format
Here's a rare one on Ebay at the moment: 90mm f2.8 Elmarit with caps, $795.00
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register