RezaLoghme
Allowing Ads
I’m considering adding a Leica 11831 50mm Elmar (the collapsible version from the 1970s–80s) to my kit and would appreciate hearing from people who have used it.
My current 50mm is a 1970s Summicron, which I know is technically the stronger lens. What I’m trying to understand is whether the Elmar brings something different enough in practice to justify owning both.
For those who have experience with the 11831:
• How does the rendering compare to a 1970s Summicron in everyday use?
• Do you notice a meaningful difference in contrast or tonal character?
• Is the collapsible form factor genuinely useful, or more of a historical curiosity?
• Are there situations where you prefer shooting with the Elmar even if you have a faster lens available?
Not looking to start a lens hierarchy debate — just interested in practical impressions from people who’ve used both.
Thanks in advance for any insights.
Do a little searching if intersted in the differences."double-gauss and Tessar style"
And these differences are....?
Yes, they are more than 10 years apart.Was there improvements in coatings?
• How does the rendering compare to a 1970s Summicron in everyday use?
• Do you notice a meaningful difference in contrast or tonal character?
• Is the collapsible form factor genuinely useful, or more of a historical curiosity?
• Are there situations where you prefer shooting with the Elmar even if you have a faster lens available?
The 50mm Elmar collapsible is one of the best lenses ever manufactured. Don't be put off by the 3.5 maximum aperture, this lens is unique and never equalled to this day.
I had the 50mm f2.8 on an old M2 and it hardly ever came off that camera. Both the camera and lens are long gone, but I have seriously thought about getting the 50mm f2.8 is m39 mount for my last Leica rangefinder camera the very old IIIa. Yes, I know it should have the 50mm f3.5, but I want the 2.8 version.
Nope! Sorry, I'm talking of the early version.Are you talking about the 11831 version from 1997-2004 we are discussing here?
This thread is about the 1990s lens, not LTM or vintage.
Source?Collapsing it on a digital M body isn't recommended.
Source?
Collapsing it on a digital M body isn't recommended.
Just wondering, how would this lens compare to the LTM version? Same optics, performance?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?