• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Lee Friedlander Lecture, Maryland Institute College of Art (date unknown)

logan2z

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 11, 2019
Messages
4,017
Location
SF Bay Area, USA
Format
Multi Format
I stumbled upon a recording of this lecture and thought I'd share it. The date of the lecture isn't given, but based on a few things Friedlander said I'm going to guess it was sometime in the '70s.

The lecture is in two parts (total runtime is about 1 hour).:

Part 1 is a walkthrough of a set of portraits that Friedlander was planning on using for a book. This part isn't very interesting since it's audio only and Friedlander says very little about each photograph. If you're a Friedlander nut like I am then it might be worth a listen - you may even know which photos he's talking about just from his brief descriptions.

https://archive.org/details/mma344-01/mma344-01.wav

Part 2 is the Q&A following the lecture. This was far more interesting as Friedlander answered questions about his photographic process, darkroom work, etc.

https://archive.org/details/mma344-01/mma345-01.wav

Enjoy.
 
It took a while to get into, but very enjoyable. His personality really comes through. And he did finally get around to making a book about the cherry blossoms in Japan!
 
One of my favorite photographers. The man had an eye, that's for sure! Would love to see a nice exhibit of Friedlander prints.
 
momus said:
One of my favorite photographers. The man had an eye, that's for sure! Would love to see a nice exhibit of Friedlander prints.
Click to expand...

His books are of excellent quality, though certainly not as good as an exhibition.
 
momus said:
One of my favorite photographers. The man had an eye, that's for sure! Would love to see a nice exhibit of Friedlander prints.
Click to expand...
I saw an exhibition a few years ago that included prints of every photo in The Little Screens. Awesome installation.

Click the image for a larger view
 
He has said that he likes to make books, maybe because more people can see his work that way. I have not seen many of his prints but I do think he makes them himself.
 
Michael Teresko said:
The MOMA retrospective, about 400 images worth, made it to San Francisco some years back. It was a stunning show, both in the sheer number and variety of quality photos. One of my all time favorites.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately I wasn't into photography at that time, it was in my own backyard ;( I do, however, have the huge hardcover book (ok, I have two copies) and look at it often.
 
logan2z said:
Unfortunately I wasn't into photography at that time, it was in my own backyard ;( I do, however, have the huge hardcover book (ok, I have two copies) and look at it often.
Click to expand...

I flew to San Francisco in 2008 for the sole purpose of attending that retrospective at SFMOMA. It was a tremendous show. And I did it again two summers ago when the Fraenkel Gallery held a book signing at the release of "Signs." Unfortunately Friedlander's arthritis kicked in and he wasn't able to sign books for very long, but I was near the front of the line, so I came away happy.

(And I flew to Albuquerque and got in a rental car and drove to Santa Fe when Friedlander was there to sign "New Mexico"...!)
 
Michael Teresko said:
The MOMA retrospective, about 400 images worth, made it to San Francisco some years back. It was a stunning show, both in the sheer number and variety of quality photos. One of my all time favorites.
Click to expand...

I completely agree with this. I had to take a few breaks along the way to go look at something else and return to look at more Friedlander photographs. The show was that good, and that overwhelming.
 
I was at Fraenkel Gallery for the 'Signs' book signing as well! I was fortunate enough to get a signature before he had to put the pen down.

I have some other signed Friedlander books as well but none of which were signed in my presence.

I admire the effort you put in to see Friedlander in person. It was only a 50 minute drive for me to see him in SF.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register