LED panel for contact printing?

hadeer

Member

Joined

Dec 30, 2006

Messages

166

Location

The Netherla

Format

Medium Format

• Mar 28, 2020

• #1

Is there anyone who has experience in contact printing with one of those slim LED panels? I wondered if it is possible to use such a panel directly sandwiching it with a digitally printed negative and the photo paper. Kaiser for instance makes the Slimlite plano led light box 32x22.8 cm. That would allow prints up to A3 size. Thanks for any input.

 

koraks

Moderator

Moderator

Joined

Nov 29, 2018

Messages

22,696

Location

Europe

Format

Multi Format

• Mar 28, 2020

• #2

The light intensity of those panels may be an issue with most printing papers except dedicated contact printing papers such as those made by Adox and Foma. With a precision timer allowing e.g. 0.1 second exposure it may work, and/or with the leds hooked up to a pwm dimming circuit.

 

OP

OP

hadeer

Member

Joined

Dec 30, 2006

Messages

166

Location

The Netherla

Format

Medium Format

• Mar 29, 2020

• #3

Thanks Koraks, I see your point. Currently I am using my enlarger as a lightsource to contact print on Adox baryta and Foma for making traditional and lith prints respectively. Without the possibility to control the exposure time that would make no sense.

 

ic-racer

Member

Joined

Feb 25, 2007

Messages

16,544

Location

USA

Format

Multi Format

• Mar 29, 2020

• #4

Better with a point source (clear globe lamp) far from the printing frame. Once you add in multiple point sources (like a frosted globe or flat panel) there will be overlap of the rays in the middle of the print with the tendency for a hot spot.

 

Michael Firstlight

Subscriber

Joined

Mar 2, 2017

Messages

460

Location

Western North Carolina

Format

Multi Format

• Mar 29, 2020

• #5

I use my flatbed to make contact prints. I don't understand why going through a wet print process is valuable unless one doesn't have a scanner - even a cheap used flatbed with a transparency option is faster and cheaper. I don't see how a wet contact print can be effectively used to determine enlargement exposure. Maybe someone can enlighten (sorry for the pun) me as to what the benefit is otherwise as my PrintFile contact printer now goes unused.

MFL

 

koraks

Moderator

Moderator

Joined

Nov 29, 2018

Messages

22,696

Location

Europe

Format

Multi Format

• Mar 29, 2020

• #6

Michael Firstlight said:

I don't understand why going through a wet print process is valuable unless one doesn't have a scanner

Click to expand...

Well, that's true if your end goal is a digital image. I think for many people who are doing wet prints, the prints are the end goal. For me they are, but that's just my perspective of course.

 

OP

OP

hadeer

Member

Joined

Dec 30, 2006

Messages

166

Location

The Netherla

Format

Medium Format

• Mar 29, 2020

• #7

koraks said:

the prints are the end goal

Click to expand...

That is exactly what I am trying to do. I never met a digital equivalent for a genuine lithprint. I need the digitally printed negative on a transparency because frequently a file from my digital camera is the source. But yes, still experimenting with the wet process.