I'm not much of a 110 user, but I pulled out some 110 (13x18mm), Minolta Super 16 (12x17mm), and Kiev 30/30M/303 (13x18mm) negatives to make a comparison. Here's what I found.
110 -- Despite the images being exposed in-between the pre-exposed portions of the film (which also includes the 110 perforations), the images are off-set 1mm. I see no reason why they are, but there probably is a reason. The edge on the side with the 110 perforations is 2mm wide, while the opposite edge is 1mm wide.
Minolta Super 16 -- The Minolta cassettes should be loaded with single perforated film (un-perforated works fine, too), but the perforated side should be loaded on the top of the cassette -- where the cassette "bridge" is located. Since the format is 1mm smaller, the image can be offset an additional millimeter to avoid the perforations. The edge on the top of the image is 3mm, while the opposite edge is 1mm wide. Loading single-perf film incorrectly, or using double-perforated film will produce sprocket holes in the image.
Kiev 30/30M/303 -- The images from these cameras are not off-set. There is 1.5mm edging on each side on the 13x18mm image. Loading single-perf or double-perforated film will produce sprocket holes in the image.
This is important in terms of negative carriers for enlargers or scanners. 110 carriers are the most common, and pretty easy to find, but they are too large for the Minolta Super 16 images, and off-set a little too much for the Kiev images.
I'm helping out BitByBitPhoto in making 3D carriers to address this issue.