Made/Packaged in Germany, so most likely Inoviscoat (Orwo?)
Well, that's less than what you pay for a bulk roll of Kodak B&W film.
As I understand what's now left of Inoviscoat is basically 'fabless', so the manufacture I'd expect to have been done on the film coating line of Polaroid in Monheim. In terms of industry structure the present state of German color film manufacture features an interesting type of disintegration/specialization.
Anyway, I'm not yet tempted to buy a bulk roll as I'm already sitting on more 35mm color film than I will likely use.
Was it ever discussed here?
I started to plough through the 7 pages
That company is InovisCoat (Monheim, Germany), see above, it is in my list.
That is a company "without own factory", because the factory they are using from time to time for their products is owned and operated by Polaroid (InovisCoat has a contract with Polaroid).
But they produce only a smaller part of Lomography's films. Lomo Lady Grey and Earl Grey are just repackaged Fomapan 100 and 400. Kino Berlin and Potsdam are repacked FilmoTec BW films.
The "normal color" CN films are repackaged Kodak amateur CN films. And only the "fancy" color films of Lomo like Lomochrome Purple and Turquois are produced by InovisCoat for Lomography.
By the way, when Lomography introduced the first of these films - Lomochrome Purple - they also made a lot of marketing fuzz claiming they have "an own factory". That was just a pure lie! They have never had any shares in InovisCoat. InovisCoat has always been independent from Lomography.
Of course they can buy film at other film manufacturers like Lucky or InovisCoat. But that has nothing to do with an own film R&D and production.
That will have to be proven by a long-term successful market presence. Crystal ball is out for re-polishing service since it was getting hella foggy, so can't tell right now.So have we now got a viable long term business that makes and sells its own colour film which seems to look OK and is another reliable source of colour film outside of Kodak and Harman's current offering ?
how reliable were the facilities
I think the point of the whole thing is that you have to distinguish between several aspects, such as the physical facilities, the intellectual property, the competence/know-how involved in color emulsions, the workforce, the legal entities, capital structures etc. The question how reliable (durable, sustainable) these are can be applied to all of them.
That's why every city has a photography enthusiast with a film producing facility in their backyard pumping out thousands of rolls of color film.And there was me thinking that as long as you have the facilities to produce a reasonable film at a profit then it was that simple
pentaxuser
That's why every city has a photography enthusiast with a film producing facility in their backyard pumping out thousands of rolls of color film.
a lot can go wrong
I think you can come up with a decent list if you sit down and think a bit how businesses might fail in general. The question is, unless you're involved in risk management for a business, why would you bother in the first place?What are these things to go wrong with what are the facilities that are currently producing film?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?