• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Kodak Vs. Digital Truth: Tri-x Dev Time Discrepancy

Millstone, High Water

A
Millstone, High Water

  • sly
  • Dec 17, 2025
  • 0
  • 2
  • 11
The Party

A
The Party

  • 0
  • 0
  • 25

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,239
Messages
2,821,012
Members
100,609
Latest member
LupoCA
Recent bookmarks
0

bessa_L_R3a

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
105
Location
Jersey City,
Format
35mm RF
Hi,

How come on Kodak's website it says Tri X 400 develops after 4.5 minutes in HC-110 Dilution B but Digital Truth says 7.5 minutes?

R.
 

Lee L

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
3,283
Format
Multi Format
Different exposure indices, different agitation, different versions of Tri-X, condenser or diffusion enlarger, different water, different temperatures... a lot of factors come in to play. There are 6 different suggestions for time, EI, and versions of Tri-X on digitaltruth. Pick one and see where it takes you, then home in on your own time.

Lee
 

ann

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,336
Format
35mm
several years ago when kodak up graded and changed trix the numbers changed and at that time there was a great out cry as to the change in time.

the out come was the thought, it was an error and some even go so far as to say, they talk to kodak and some where there agreed ,but the 4.5 stayed.

(note all the someone's and do what you like)

the upstart, most people that i am aware of stayed with their tested times and disregarded the shorter suggestion.

also, i would second lee's statement as in our lab we use between 6 to 6.5 minutes with that developer and ratio. negatives are great unless there is a user error.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

df cardwell

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
3,357
Location
KY USA
Format
Multi Format
The most irritating flaw in the concept of 'digital truth' is lack of source data.
No intention, no explanatory information whatsoever.
With no accountability for its data,
The Massive Chart is Babel-Like in its potential for chaos.
 

MPandolfo

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Messages
59
Location
Santiago
Format
35mm
Like others already said, you have to adjust the exact time to your own procedures and equipment, that said, 7.5 min dil B @EI400 works well for me.
 

Uncle Bill

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
1,395
Location
Oakville and
Format
Multi Format
Digital truth is a wonderful resource when comparing developing time with different developers. I have found though with some old favourites (Tri-x in HC110 being a good example) I tend to look around at a few sites to get a rough idea.

I have in the past got good results at 6 min 30 seconds at 20 c.

I have found the D76 1+1 time of 9.75 min to be spot on for Tri-x 400 as outlined in Kodak's tech pub. on the film.

Bill
 

Rich Ullsmith

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
1,159
Format
Medium Format
Yeah, I always compare with Unblinkingeye if there's a question.
 

ann

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,336
Format
35mm
try semi stand development at 23 minutes now that is a long time :smile:

the reality is we all need to do what is necessary to make fine negatives. the better the negative the easier the printing.

after all it is only a number.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom