Kodak Ultra 800 versus Fuji Superia 800

BetterSense

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
3,151
Location
North Caroli
Format
35mm
CVS has Kodak Ultra (or is it Ultramax?) 800. Walmart has Superia 800. Both are similarly priced. Which makes the best P&S fodder?
 

Athiril

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
3,062
Location
Tokyo
Format
Medium Format
For what? Pushing? Sharpness @ 800?

Superia 800 @ 640 is quite nice. Dunno where those negs got too though.
 
OP
OP

BetterSense

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
3,151
Location
North Caroli
Format
35mm
I'm going to be shooting this in my XA and Stylus cameras. I always use high-speed film in these types of cameras because I get more in-focus shots. I guess I'm interested in which one has more real speed and gives good natural colors.
 

wblynch

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
1,697
Location
Mission Viejo
Format
127 Format
I like the Kodak Ultra(max?) 800 a lot more than the Fuji 800 (especially the Walgreen's version).

I found the Kodak to be very low grain and great color (but not very saturated), where the Fuji came back very grainy and the color seemed shifted toward the green.

This was my observation from the prints I got back from Costco. I scanned the negatives myself to see what adjustments I could make and the basic scans came out just like the Costco prints. Enhancing the scan results helped the Fuji a lot and I was able to add some saturation to the Kodak.

In the end, I liked Kodak much more than Fuji and went out and bought 8 rolls of Kodak 800. I still have 3 or 4 rolls yet to use.

By the way, I used the Kodak 800 in my XA2 since it has a tendency to underexpose. The pictures from that camera came out very nice.
 

perkeleellinen

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
2,906
Location
Warwickshire
Format
35mm
My experience is that Superia 800 is nicer than Ultramax*. I find that the Fuji handles mixed lighting better, I think it shows less grain than Ultramax which I've found to be quite coarse. So almost the complete opposite of wblynch, above! Which, of course, leads to the inevitable recommendation: you're going to have to try a roll of each yourself.

Both films look nicer when rated at 640, I find, especially in the shadows, but you won't be able to do that with the Stylus.


* optical printing or home scanning.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

dynachrome

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,757
Format
35mm
Portra 800 and the Fuji 800 are the two best 800 speed color print films and are both much better than the MAX 800. My preference is for the Portra 800 but it sells for nearly $10 a roll in some places. I am sometimes substituting 400 film and using faster lenses or using a DSLR and just setting the ISO to 800.
 

Tim Gray

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
1,882
Location
OH
Format
35mm
People seem to slam Max 800 a lot, and say that Portra 800 is a lot better. While I do think Portra 800 is great and is my go to high speed color neg, is Max 800 really that different? Ron Andrews doesn't seem to think so, and I think he was part of the group that developed both of them. Kodak's tech pubs seem to back this up. I'll quote him:


From this thread.

The thing is, I don't know where you can buy this stuff. I guess in real stores, but I have a hard time tracking down Ultra Max 800 online. Maybe I should get a fresh roll or two and do a comparison of it with Portra 800.
 

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
I love the Fuji Superia 800. I have shot more of it than any other color film. I have been pretty well disappointed by the Kodak in comparison. The Fuji is sharp, fine grained, very neutral and accurate in color, and easy to color balance in the enlarger. (I really wish that it was made in medium format, and large format, for that matter.) The Kodak has seemed only slightly better than dollar store film when I have used it. It gets really grainy with underexposure, and it seems slightly "wonky" in general to me.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…