• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

kodak tri-x pan film

trudee yama

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 28, 2005
Messages
49
Format
4x5 Format
Hi All,

Was given 8 boxes of Kodak Tri-X film, 5 1/4" X 20', cat. #166-5165, exp. date of 6/1982. This film has been kept in refrig. all this time. I currently use 4x5 sheet film.
What was this film used for? How can I tell emulsion side? How do you develop this film? What is the history of this film? Do you cut to size? And, if you want to have a contact print on an 11x14 paper and cut to 14" in length, how do you store it properly? Are there enlargers for this?

Probably more questions later,

Trudee
 

PHOTOTONE

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
2,412
Location
Van Buren, A
Format
Large Format
If it is rolled up, the emulsion would generally be on the inside, the base on the outside of the roll. A clip from the end of a roll would tell you. Tri-x emulsion side is considerably lighter in color than the base side. If you are going to cut it to use it in a view camera, you would process it in trays using common b/w film chemistry. There have been enlargers that would take a 14" long negative (11x14 size enlargers) but they are quite rare, and really not needed. You would normally make contact prints from negatives this large. There are quite a number of photographers that purchase surplus aerial photography roll film and cut it down (in darkness) to fit their large format cameras. It is on thin base, so is not as easy to use in large sizes as purpose-made large format film.
 

David William White

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
1,177
Location
Hamilton, Ca
Format
Multi Format
Sounds like a fun film for pinhole landscapes!

I'd feel for a notch, then chop a few inches off the end of a sheet to take a look at it in the light and then mark the box as emulsion up or down. Then chop another piece and develop to check for fog -- but probably okay.

I'd either make a pinhole for contact printing on 16x20 or chop down to 4x5. If I was going pinhole at 5.25x20, I'd process in paper tray, see-sawing back and forth (if small tray) for standard times & standard developers.

I'd store the negs in the original box.

Hope that helps.

P.S. Oh, crap, I misread. I thought 20 inches, but see it's 20 feet. Must be rolls. No notches then, and silly to store negs in original box. Sorry.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

nickrapak

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
740
Location
Horsham, PA
Format
Multi Format
This sounds to me like it could be film for a Cirkut panoramic camera, although Verichrome Pan was (IIRC) the only film available for those cameras at that time.
 

eworkman

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
64
Location
Central Coas
Format
Med. Format Pan
Most likely for the K-24 / K- 20 aerial cameras. It might drop right in a K-20. Later standard aerial film is 5 inches wide.
And IIRC it may be the same width as the {really old} film for one of the graflex roll holders - that made postcards size negs - #53 perhaps? There's one here in the pile.

If so then there is no "ASA" but an aerial speed, meant for "overdevelopment" with regard to pictorial use- but that's not to discourage you as Jim Galli has, among others, used areial film at the same EI as the pictorial brother e.g.; Plus X Aerial at 125 just like Plus X Pan etc. YMMV, but not by very much. I tried some aerial and hedged my bet by using, after studying the development-contrast index curves, half the aerial number and it worked well in a #4 Panoram that had been shimmed to take 122 film. As yours is old albeit kept cold, I'd try 200 speed and if that indicates, up from there.
Vigorous yet pictorial development is probably appropriate, maybe HC-110 dilution B or even D-76 straight or 1:1 at the Kdak start times - you appear to be on a roll of good luck

Would you consider selling one roll? If I can afford it?

regards
Ed
 

Phil

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
114
Location
Vermont
Format
8x10 Format
I found it in my 1981-1982 Kodak product reference guide. It's listed as Kodak Tri-X Pan Film - "Very fast film for aerial cameras. Primararily for low-leve obliques. Also available in 35 mm and 70 mm. Film Speed ASA 400." Price per Roll $24.85
 

nworth

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
2,228
Location
Los Alamos,
Format
Multi Format
The size is a standard aerial film size. Aerial films come in long rolls like you describe. Kodak does not currently list a Tri-X aerial film, but that doesn't mean it didn't produce one in the past. (Look for Aerial, Aerographic, or Aerecon someplace on the label. If you find it, then it's aerial film for sure; otherwise, it still very likely is.) Aerial films are generally designed for somewhat higher contrast than ordinary films, and they often have enhanced red sensitivity. Other than that, they work pretty much the same as what you're used to. They can be used for regular photography. Kodak aerial materials usually have speeds about the same as their similarly named still and motion picture films, although the speed rating system for aerial photography is a bit different from that used for ordinary photography. For a start, try exposing and processing sheets as you would fo ordinary Tri-X. Then make adjustments as you would for any new film.
 
OP
OP

trudee yama

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 28, 2005
Messages
49
Format
4x5 Format
ok, once I finish developing, are there sleeves for storing the negs?
 

mike11746

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
1
Format
Multi Format

Are you selling this film? If so, How much per roll. I have a K-20 Areal camera that uses this film. Mike
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,745
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Probably has a lot of base fog. I have some hp5 from around early 1980s and the base is up to around .7 log d since I last checked.
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,522
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
Probably has about four more years' worth of base fog now than it did when the question was asked!

-NT