The main difference is the Disposal section on page 5. The new document has more warnings and the phone numbers removed.I now have the old 2008 J-109 and the new Feb 2018 publication. Dadgummit, seems those young whippersnappers from Kodak have changed the way to get to J-109. So now we have two dates of Feb 2018 and March 2008 but can't see any other changes at first glance.
That’s one reason I’d like to see the J-107 Xtol document. It was written in those heady days. How did it describe Xtol? Great claims were made for Xtol’s performance at launch.
I have not. That sounds fascinating, and hopefully less elusive than this J-107. I’ll hunt it down.Have you read Dick Dickerson and Silvia Zawadzki's article "The Genesis of Xtol", in the Sept/Oct 1999 issue of Photo Techniques?
You’re a hero! Thanks for going to the trouble.Believe it or not, I just found copies of Kodak's Xtol publications J-107 (small tank / tray processing) from 1996, and J-108 (rotary tube processing) in a directory of Very Old Things on my computer. I am attaching them to this post, which will hopefully work.
That makes me more confident in the storage life of this stuff.I note that the recommendations for storage life in J-107 and J-108 suggest one year in a full, closed bottle - twice the recommendation in J-109.
Already sourced from another kind forum member.I have a pdf copy of Dick Dickerson and Silvia Zawadzki's article "The Genesis of Xtol", from the Sept/Oct 1999 issue of Photo Techniques.
It is too large to upload it here.
I wonder what made Kodak decide to be more conservative in its suggestion on shelf life? My experience with airless winebags would see to accord with Kodak's original suggestion of a year. In fact even a year may be conservative in a full, closed bottleI note that the recommendations for storage life in J-107 and J-108 suggest one year in a full, closed bottle - twice the recommendation in J-109.
.
I'm interested in reading this. The magazine is gone, isn't it? Perhaps you could upload and share a PDF of the article.I scanned the Sep.Oct 1999 PhotoTechniques article by Dick and Silvia "Genesis of Xtol"
If anyone is interested please let me know
On the units alone they’ve managed to squeeze all of these spelling and formatting inconsistencies into just two pages:
“1 gal” ....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?