From what I saw of the link the Metropolis film is C41. I an not sure if you are saying that Lomography Metropolis film has nothing to do with Kodak. I cannot say at this stage that Henning Serger will say to my questions but if it is not Kodak stock and the engineers to which he refers are not Kodak not and the factory to which he refers and to which he has been is not a Kodak facility then all I can say is that his reply to which I refer lacks detail@pentaxuser not the Metropolis film, the Lomography colour negative films....the 100, 400 and 800 ISO C41 films without any weird effects. Believed to be Kodacolor VR or similar. Certainly act like Kodacolor VR in the case of the 100 and 400. The 800 could be Max 800 as seen in Kodak single use cameras. Some speculation there but it seems likely. It ain't Fuji for sure, and nobody else is making C41 film currently.
Maybe tri-x with a blue filter B+W 081?
as long as we still can buy.
I appreciate that. It was just that I thought you may have been drawing attention to the possible implication that Lomography stock was in fact Kodak stock and thus the Lomography Metropolis was also likely to be Kodak stock. Unless of course Lomography has its own film producing function somewhere but it is only big enough for Metropolis and not the other films it has which may be Kodak stockI'm not talking about Metropolis at all. What I've said is that the regular Lomography colour negative films, the ones without the special effects, are also in short supply...which would only add to the notion that Kodak has been unable to keep up with demand for amateur colour films.
Film photography is not a cheap hobby, never was and never will be. Other hobbies can be more expensive like backing horses or playing golf.
It is a small market now compared to what it used to be, so I am happy to still have film available.
Remember that different markets have different prices so what one thinks expensive in one country is considered cheap in another and vice versa.
Will it stop me buying it? No.
Excellent point. I hope everything works out, both EK and KA seem to be struggling.I would rather have someone else buy and combine the businesses of Kodak Alaris and the film production facilities and business of Eastman Kodak then have Eastman Kodak buy Kodak Alaris' business.
Eastman Kodak is a publicly traded company that focuses on commercial printing systems. It has a legacy division that makes film.
One cannot "remember" something that's fake. Kodak has exhibited many faults over the decades, but none of them were/are the cause of this price increase....Remember this price increase is due to Kodak faults. I won't pay for other's faults.
XTOL has nothing to do with film prices, or availability.Well, if you Kodak want to increase prices you oughta gimme perfect products (and not flawed Xtol) and I want them to be available anywhere anytime!
Ain't wait for my 2 months flawed Xtol order. It's not acceptable.
Now tell me: why would I continue to use Kodak while Ilford products are better priced and have more widespread availability (in the entire world)?
Remember this price increase is due to Kodak faults. I won't pay for other's faults.
Remember this price increase is due to Kodak faults. I won't pay for other's faults.
I can almost guarantee you that ilford will follow suit with prices..
Not since the bankruptcy.kodak chemicals are made by champion, right ?
I'm sure that they were. I'm also sure that Harman is or has actively investigated diversifying their manufacturing sources - particularly since their largest market remain the the USA.They are. All of them.
wow. you print 7 meters of 12" color per month? that's crazy, but I like it.I very rarely use Kodak film - there are cheaper alternatives, however I use Kodak Endura for printing colour, so it is possibly fortunate I have recently bought a new 88m roll of 12". That will keep me busy for around a year or so.
well, in Japan Ilford is already much more expensive than Kodak. Some items up to 5x the price of Kodak.Kodak need to take a long hard look at themselves and their markets.
Supply and demand is fine, providing you don't price yourselves out of the market.
I'd love to keep using Kodak B&W film but Ilford B&W film is much cheaper, especially in the UK, and the difference does not justify the higher prices Kodak charge.
Mik.
Well, if you Kodak want to increase prices you oughta gimme perfect products (and not flawed Xtol) and I want them to be available anywhere anytime!
Ain't wait for my 2 months flawed Xtol order. It's not acceptable.
Now tell me: why would I continue to use Kodak while Ilford products are better priced and have more widespread availability (in the entire world)?
Remember this price increase is due to Kodak faults. I won't pay for other's faults.
What's the pricing of Fuji products (the film, not the chemicals) like in Japan by comparison?well, in Japan Ilford is already much more expensive than Kodak. Some items up to 5x the price of Kodak.
1 liter of microphen is USD 30.00 !!!
the packages are rotting on the shelves here. No one is buying at this price.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?