After fixing my film I realized that I used sprint speed fixer without hardener and I wonder if anyone has ever tried using a hardening fixer (I only have Kodak powder fix on hand) after fixing with a non-hardening fixer.
I know. Dumb.
What is the reason for wanting to use a hardening fixer? I think there are few films still in production where it is normally preferable, but perhaps you have high temperature wash water or something unusual like that? A separate hardener can be used, or I suppose re-fixing could be done too (no need for the full time, but you would need the longer wash).
I agree with Martin. They are fixed and unless youhave an unusual situation they do not need a hardener. I have not used a hardening fixer in at least 20 years.
Thank you- I am nervous about scratches, and have always used fixer with hardener with film. I will indicate on the sleeve that they aren't hardened and use extra care.... thanks for your responses!!!
Thank you- I am nervous about scratches, and have always used fixer with hardener with film. I will indicate on the sleeve that they aren't hardened and use extra care.... thanks for your responses!!!
Like Jim and John, I never use it, for film or paper. As Matt pointed out, it makes toning more difficult. Also, on the rare occasion I want to treat a negative with selenium, it's much easier without a hardening fix. I never have a problem with scratches on the modern emulsions I use.
I have always used ordinary everyday Kodak Fixer. It's the best there is. It's a regular normal acid hardening fixer. I wouldn't think of using anything else. Just as corn flakes is probably to this day, Kelloggs' flagship cereal, so is Kodak Fixer to that company. Not a reason in the world not to use it, without second thought.