Noel,
...or Fuji? There's lots of their stock around, even if they no longer have the same equivalents to Kodak and Ilford. Tokyo is great in that it's possible to buy some of the smaller brands (now just Foma, Rollei, even Lomo-branded film, but in the past there was a lot more) but the rest of Japan mostly sticks to the big three: Fuji, Kodak, and Ilford (in that order). As for uni students shooting film...I know from experience that some members of the "film clubs" at universities shoot film, but I don't know that there are any classes that still support film/darkroom work. It might be possible at an arts university, but I've never taught at one.
When I got my first SLR in 2001 (a Nikon FE, which I still shoot with), most of the old Japanese photographers (all men, all retired) would kind of laugh at me, gently, like someone who didn't know any better (they were all shooting the latest Canon automatic whatevers) but they usually offered very useful advice. Now I kind of get wistful looks (from the same population -- it seems only younger people are shooting film here in Japan) whenever they spot my old manual film camera, whatever it may be. However, it's obvious that film still has a major following here in Japan, compared to most other places, because it's still possible to find film coolers and darkroom sections in camera stores, and getting film developed locally, whether slide, negative, or black and white, 35mm, 120, or large format, is still doable, and reasonably fast and cheap. One of the reasons why I prefer to live and work in Japan (as opposed to Canada) is for that very reason.
Eric -- thanks for the heads-up about Bic. I've used them before, but have always thought of them as a lesser version to Yodobashi (in Kyoto that's certainly the case). I'll definitely check them out the next time I put an order in.
Being someone who graduated from an art photo program, I can say that the people using film are not part of "film clubs." Film is still heavily used in art photo programs across the country in part because it offers various alternatives from 35mm. At this point in my photo life, 35mm is too wide a format for me, and I greatly prefer 4x5 (whether from 6x7 film or a view camera). I like 6x6 a lot as well if it's done well. The more organic look of film is also appreciated by a lot of art photo people, and I think that's why a lot of current art photo people use film.
If you go around art photo programs across the country, or look at the type of camera used to make images going into a lot of exhibitions and photo books today, film is all over the place, from 35mm on up to 8x10.
Fridge full of tri-x and freezer full of provia 400x. At this point I have enough to shoot for a year.
If Kodak gets more expensive I'll have to stick to fujifilm. Hopefully they don't cut Acros100.
Sent from Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?